Csibra Gergely, Gergely György
School of Psychology, Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 Jan;124(1):60-78. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.09.007. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
Humans show a strong and early inclination to interpret observed behaviours of others as goal-directed actions. We identify two main epistemic functions that this 'teleological obsession' serves: on-line prediction and social learning. We show how teleological action interpretations can serve these functions by drawing on two kinds of inference ('action-to-goal' or 'goal-to-action'), and argue that both types of teleological inference constitute inverse problems that can only be solved by further assumptions. We pinpoint the assumptions that the three currently proposed mechanisms of goal attribution (action-effect associations, simulation procedures, and teleological reasoning) imply, and contrast them with the functions they are supposed to fulfil. We argue that while action-effect associations and simulation procedures are generally well suited to serve on-line action monitoring and prediction, social learning of new means actions and artefact functions requires the inferential productivity of teleological reasoning.
人类表现出一种强烈且早期的倾向,即将观察到的他人行为解释为有目标导向的行动。我们确定了这种“目的论执念”所发挥的两个主要认知功能:在线预测和社会学习。我们展示了目的论行动解释如何通过利用两种推理(“行动到目标”或“目标到行动”)来服务于这些功能,并认为这两种目的论推理都构成了只能通过进一步假设才能解决的逆问题。我们明确了目前提出的三种目标归因机制(行动 - 效果关联、模拟程序和目的论推理)所隐含的假设,并将它们与它们应该实现的功能进行对比。我们认为,虽然行动 - 效果关联和模拟程序通常非常适合用于在线行动监测和预测,但新手段行动和人工制品功能的社会学习需要目的论推理的推理生产力。