Suppr超能文献

量子点分子信标的优化连接与猝灭策略

Optimized linkage and quenching strategies for quantum dot molecular beacons.

作者信息

Cady Nathaniel C, Strickland Aaron D, Batt Carl A

机构信息

Department of Food Science, Cornell University, 317 Stocking Hall, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.

出版信息

Mol Cell Probes. 2007 Apr;21(2):116-24. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2006.09.001. Epub 2006 Sep 17.

Abstract

Quantum dot (QD) molecular beacons were explored for sequence-specific DNA detection. The effectiveness of multiple linkage strategies and fluorescence quenchers were compared in hybridization-based assays. To compare linkage strategies, covalent amide linkage and streptavidin-biotin binding were used to link semiconductor QDs to molecular beacon DNA. Amide-linked beacons showed a 57% greater fluorescence increase than streptavidin-linked beacons when hybridized to 200 pmol of target DNA. The specificity of the molecular beacons, however, was similar for both linkage methods. Hybridization of both QD molecular beacons with non-complementary target DNA resulted in approximately 50% lower fluorescence intensity than hybridization with complementary DNA. The effectiveness of different quencher moieties was also evaluated. Iowa Black and 1.4 nm Nanogold-quenched molecular beacons exhibited approximately 2-fold greater fluorescence increases than dabcyl-quenched beacons when hybridized to complementary target. Specificity for target DNA was also confirmed through hybridization assays with non-complementary DNA. To provide insight into differences between the QD molecular beacons and the linkage strategies used, the hydrodynamic radius of each was measured. These measurements indicated that the larger radius of the streptavidin QDs (13.5 nm) than the carboxyl QDs (7 nm) could have a negative effect on FRET-based quenching for QD molecular beacons. These data outline the importance of choosing proper linkage methods and quencher moieties for creating high-quality QD molecular beacons.

摘要

研究了量子点(QD)分子信标用于序列特异性DNA检测。在基于杂交的分析中比较了多种连接策略和荧光猝灭剂的效果。为了比较连接策略,使用共价酰胺连接和链霉亲和素-生物素结合将半导体量子点连接到分子信标DNA上。当与200 pmol的靶DNA杂交时,酰胺连接的信标比链霉亲和素连接的信标荧光增加57%。然而,两种连接方法的分子信标的特异性相似。两种量子点分子信标与非互补靶DNA杂交产生的荧光强度比与互补DNA杂交低约50%。还评估了不同猝灭剂部分的效果。当与互补靶杂交时,艾奥瓦黑和1.4 nm纳米金猝灭的分子信标比达比酰猝灭的信标荧光增加约2倍。通过与非互补DNA的杂交分析也证实了对靶DNA的特异性。为了深入了解量子点分子信标与所使用的连接策略之间的差异,测量了每个分子信标的流体动力学半径。这些测量表明,链霉亲和素量子点(13.5 nm)比羧基量子点(7 nm)的半径大可能会对量子点分子信标的基于荧光共振能量转移(FRET)的猝灭产生负面影响。这些数据概述了选择合适的连接方法和猝灭剂部分以创建高质量量子点分子信标的重要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验