Giovannelli Lucia, Migliore Maria Colomba, Capra Giuseppina, Caleca Maria Pia, Bellavia Carmelina, Perino Antonio, Viviano Enza, Matranga Domenica, Ammatuna Pietro
Dipartimento di Igiene e Microbiologia, Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Jan;45(1):248-51. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01576-06. Epub 2006 Nov 8.
Methods that used specimens from three genital sites (penile brushing [PB], urethral brushing [UB], and the retrieval of semen [SE]) from 50 men were examined for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA detection. The rates of detection by PB, UB, SE, PB and UB, and PB and SE were 88.9%, 50.0%, 33.3%, 100%, and 97.2%, respectively. The use of PB and UB appears to be the most accurate method; as an alternative to UB, the use of SE with PB could be used to improve the rate of HPV DNA detection in men.
对来自50名男性的三个生殖部位(阴茎刷检[PB]、尿道刷检[UB]和精液采集[SE])的标本进行人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)DNA检测方法的研究。PB、UB、SE、PB和UB、PB和SE的检测率分别为88.9%、50.0%、33.3%、100%和97.2%。使用PB和UB似乎是最准确的方法;作为UB的替代方法,PB联合SE可用于提高男性HPV DNA的检测率。