Proust-Lima Cécile, Amieva Hélène, Dartigues Jean-François, Jacqmin-Gadda Hélène
INSERM E0338, Bordeaux, France.
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Feb 1;165(3):344-50. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwk017. Epub 2006 Nov 14.
Choosing the measure of cognition in an epidemiologic study investigating cognitive changes over time is a challenging question. A powerful measure must be able to detect small cognitive changes in all the range of cognition observed in the target population. This work aims at comparing the sensitivity to detect cognitive changes in the observed range of cognition of four widely used psychometric tests in an aging-population-based study through a nonlinear latent process model, assuming that the psychometric tests are nonlinear noisy transformations of their common factor. With data from the French prospective cohort study PAQUID (1989-2001), the authors found that the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Benton Visual Retention Test exhibited a better sensitivity to cognitive changes in low levels of cognition, while the Digit Symbol Substitution Test was more sensitive to changes in high levels of cognition. In contrast, the Isaacs Set Test shortened at 15 seconds appeared to be sensitive to small changes in all the range of cognition and, thus, represents an appropriate measure of cognition in population-based studies including both highly normal and severely impaired subjects.
在一项调查认知随时间变化的流行病学研究中,选择认知测量方法是一个具有挑战性的问题。一种有效的测量方法必须能够在目标人群观察到的所有认知范围内检测到微小的认知变化。这项工作旨在通过一个非线性潜在过程模型,比较在一项基于老年人群的研究中,四种广泛使用的心理测量测试在观察到的认知范围内检测认知变化的敏感性,假设心理测量测试是其共同因素的非线性噪声变换。根据法国前瞻性队列研究PAQUID(1989 - 2001)的数据,作者发现简易精神状态检查表和本顿视觉保持测验在低认知水平下对认知变化表现出更好的敏感性,而数字符号替换测验对高认知水平的变化更敏感。相比之下,15秒限时的艾萨克斯成套测验似乎对所有认知范围内的微小变化都敏感,因此,在包括高度正常和严重受损受试者的基于人群的研究中,它是一种合适的认知测量方法。