Banfi G, Dolci A
Istituto Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2006 Dec;46(4):611-6.
The free testosterone:cortisol ratio (FTCR) is widely used for studying and preventing overtraining syndrome in various sports. The use of FTCR for following overtraining syndrome was proposed originally with two approaches: FTCR lower than 0.35x10(-3), calculated on free testosterone (FT) in nanomoles per liter (nmol/L) and on cortisol (C) in micromoles per liter (mmole/L) or a decrease of the ratio of 30% or more in comparison with the previous value. In our experience, the use of an absolute value as a threshold is not useful, whereas the evaluation of the concentrations of hormones and their ratio in comparison with previous ones is more useful. These classical approaches are not, however, sufficient to describe the various possible physiological modifications linked to training excess and/or incomplete recovery.
We collected samples from 32 professional soccer players of an Italian First Division team, during the period July 2001-July 2003. We analyzed the values of 21 athletes during the season 2001-2002 and of 11 athletes during the season 2002-2003 (6 out of 11 were examined also during the previous one) always present when the 4 (first season) or 5 (second season) blood drawings have been performed. We applied an original, pragmatic and easy-to-use classification of FTCR values, in association with classical interpretations based on decreases of the values in comparison with previous athlete's result.
We used the traditional approaches in two consecutive seasons in a professional soccer team: the evaluation of the decrease >30% of the parameter in comparison with the previous value or with the basal (preseason) value are shown. The statistical differences between the FTCR values of the six athletes followed in both seasons were not significant.
The classification method we propose is advantageous in comparison with traditional interpretative schemes, because identify different risk categories, stratifying the interval between the values 0.35-0.8.
游离睾酮与皮质醇比值(FTCR)被广泛用于各类运动中过度训练综合征的研究和预防。最初提出使用FTCR来追踪过度训练综合征有两种方法:FTCR低于0.35×10⁻³,该值基于以纳摩尔每升(nmol/L)为单位的游离睾酮(FT)和以微摩尔每升(mmol/L)为单位的皮质醇(C)计算得出;或者与先前值相比比值下降30%或更多。根据我们的经验,使用绝对值作为阈值并无用处,而将激素浓度及其与先前值的比值进行评估则更有用。然而,这些传统方法不足以描述与训练过度和/或恢复不完全相关的各种可能的生理变化。
我们在2001年7月至2003年7月期间,从一支意大利甲级联赛球队的32名职业足球运动员身上采集样本。我们分析了2001 - 2002赛季21名运动员以及2002 - 2003赛季11名运动员(11名中有6名在前一个赛季也接受了检查)的值,这些值是在进行4次(第一个赛季)或5次(第二个赛季)采血时获取的。我们应用了一种原始、实用且易于使用的FTCR值分类方法,并结合基于与运动员先前结果相比值的下降情况的经典解释。
我们在一个职业足球队连续两个赛季使用了传统方法:展示了与先前值或基础(季前赛)值相比参数下降>30%的评估情况。两个赛季都接受追踪的6名运动员的FTCR值之间的统计差异不显著。
与传统解释方案相比,我们提出的分类方法具有优势,因为它能识别不同的风险类别,将0.35 - 0.8之间的值进行分层。