Amalberti R, Vincent C, Auroy Y, de Saint Maurice G
IMASSA, Cognitive Science Department, Brétigny sur Orge, France.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Dec;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i66-71. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015982.
Violations are deliberate deviations from standard procedure. The usual reaction is to attempt to eliminate them and reprimand those concerned. However, the situation is not that simple. Firstly, violations paradoxically may be markers of high levels of safety because they need constraints and defences to exist. They may even become more frequent than errors in ultrasafe systems. Secondly, violations have both positive and negative aspects. On the one hand they occur frequently, increase system performance and individual satisfaction, are mostly limited to practices with limited safety consequences, and therefore are often tolerated or even encouraged by the hierarchy. On the other hand, extreme violations can lead to real danger or actual harm. This paper proposes a three phase model derived from Rasmussen's theory of migration to boundaries to explain the mechanism by which the deviance occurs, stabilizes, regresses, or progresses to harm. The model suggests that violations are unavoidable because system dynamics and deviances are markers of adaptation to this dynamicity. Violations cannot be eliminated but they can be managed. Solutions are specific to each step of the model, with a mix of relaxing constraints, increasing peer control (staff), and constraining dangerous individuals.
违规是对标准程序的蓄意背离。通常的反应是试图消除它们并斥责相关人员。然而,情况并非如此简单。首先,矛盾的是,违规可能是高安全水平的标志,因为它们需要约束和防御才能存在。在超安全系统中,它们甚至可能比错误更频繁出现。其次,违规具有积极和消极两个方面。一方面,它们频繁发生,提高系统性能和个人满意度,大多限于安全后果有限的操作,因此往往被层级容忍甚至鼓励。另一方面,极端违规可能导致真正的危险或实际伤害。本文提出了一个源自拉斯穆森迁移到边界理论的三阶段模型,以解释违规行为发生、稳定、消退或发展为伤害的机制。该模型表明,违规是不可避免的,因为系统动态和偏差是适应这种动态性的标志。违规无法消除,但可以进行管理。针对模型的每个步骤都有具体的解决方案,包括放宽约束、加强同伴控制(员工)以及约束危险个体。