Suppr超能文献

医疗保健中的违规行为与人员流动:理解与管理框架

Violations and migrations in health care: a framework for understanding and management.

作者信息

Amalberti R, Vincent C, Auroy Y, de Saint Maurice G

机构信息

IMASSA, Cognitive Science Department, Brétigny sur Orge, France.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Dec;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i66-71. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015982.

Abstract

Violations are deliberate deviations from standard procedure. The usual reaction is to attempt to eliminate them and reprimand those concerned. However, the situation is not that simple. Firstly, violations paradoxically may be markers of high levels of safety because they need constraints and defences to exist. They may even become more frequent than errors in ultrasafe systems. Secondly, violations have both positive and negative aspects. On the one hand they occur frequently, increase system performance and individual satisfaction, are mostly limited to practices with limited safety consequences, and therefore are often tolerated or even encouraged by the hierarchy. On the other hand, extreme violations can lead to real danger or actual harm. This paper proposes a three phase model derived from Rasmussen's theory of migration to boundaries to explain the mechanism by which the deviance occurs, stabilizes, regresses, or progresses to harm. The model suggests that violations are unavoidable because system dynamics and deviances are markers of adaptation to this dynamicity. Violations cannot be eliminated but they can be managed. Solutions are specific to each step of the model, with a mix of relaxing constraints, increasing peer control (staff), and constraining dangerous individuals.

摘要

违规是对标准程序的蓄意背离。通常的反应是试图消除它们并斥责相关人员。然而,情况并非如此简单。首先,矛盾的是,违规可能是高安全水平的标志,因为它们需要约束和防御才能存在。在超安全系统中,它们甚至可能比错误更频繁出现。其次,违规具有积极和消极两个方面。一方面,它们频繁发生,提高系统性能和个人满意度,大多限于安全后果有限的操作,因此往往被层级容忍甚至鼓励。另一方面,极端违规可能导致真正的危险或实际伤害。本文提出了一个源自拉斯穆森迁移到边界理论的三阶段模型,以解释违规行为发生、稳定、消退或发展为伤害的机制。该模型表明,违规是不可避免的,因为系统动态和偏差是适应这种动态性的标志。违规无法消除,但可以进行管理。针对模型的每个步骤都有具体的解决方案,包括放宽约束、加强同伴控制(员工)以及约束危险个体。

相似文献

1
Violations and migrations in health care: a framework for understanding and management.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Dec;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i66-71. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015982.
2
Organizational accountability in a just culture.
Urol Nurs. 2008 Dec;28(6):427-30.
3
A systems approach to error prevention in medicine.
J Surg Oncol. 2004 Dec 1;88(3):115-21. doi: 10.1002/jso.20121.
4
Integrating CUSP and TRIP to improve patient safety.
Hosp Pract (1995). 2010 Nov;38(4):114-21. doi: 10.3810/hp.2010.11.348.
5
Overcoming barriers to patient safety.
Nurs Econ. 2006 May-Jun;24(3):143-8, 155, 123; quiz 149.
6
Patient safety and collaboration of the intensive care unit team.
Crit Care Nurse. 2009 Apr;29(2):85-91. doi: 10.4037/ccn2009281.
7
The culture of safety.
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2005 Feb;6(1):51-4. doi: 10.1177/1527154404272146.
8
Quality and safety by design.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Dec;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i1-3. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.020347.
9
Blame--do you know it when you see it?
Outcomes Manag. 2003 Jul-Sep;7(3):91-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Woman or surgeon - Not both: Perceptions of support, enablers and barriers in general surgery.
Surg Open Sci. 2024 Oct 11;22:3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.10.002. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Do healthcare professionals work around safety standards, and should we be worried? A scoping review.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Apr 17;34(5):317-329. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017546.
4
Considering context in area-level socioeconomic status, cancer treatment initiation, and survival.
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023 Aug 31;7(5). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkad078.
5
Aligning work-as-imagined and work-as-done using FRAM on a hospital ward: a roadmap.
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Oct;11(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001992.
6
Exploring Goal Conflicts and How They Are Managed in a Biomedical Laboratory Using Rasmussen's Model of Boundaries.
Appl Biosaf. 2021 Sep;26(Suppl 1):S43-S55. doi: 10.1089/apb.21.919624. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
7
An exploratory survey study of disorder and its association with safety culture in four hospitals.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 21;22(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07930-6.
8
How to do no harm: empowering local leaders to make care safer in low-resource settings.
Arch Dis Child. 2021 Apr;106(4):333-337. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-320631. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
9
Calibration Bias and the Interpretation of Clinical Learning Environment Perceptions Surveys.
J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Dec;12(6):727-736. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00237.1. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
10
Operating room time as a limited resource: ethical considerations for allocation.
J Med Ethics. 2022 Jan;48(1):14-18. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106519. Epub 2020 Dec 10.

本文引用的文献

3
Anaesthetists' intentions to violate safety guidelines.
Anaesthesia. 2004 Jun;59(6):528-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03741.x.
5
Diagnosing "vulnerable system syndrome": an essential prerequisite to effective risk management.
Qual Health Care. 2001 Dec;10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii21-5. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100021...
6
Exploring the causes of adverse events in NHS hospital practice.
J R Soc Med. 2001 Jul;94(7):322-30. doi: 10.1177/014107680109400702.
7
On error management: lessons from aviation.
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):781-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.781.
9
The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II.
N Engl J Med. 1991 Feb 7;324(6):377-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102073240605.
10
Determinants of intention to commit driving violations.
Accid Anal Prev. 1992 Apr;24(2):117-31. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(92)90028-h.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验