Sherifali Diana, Pinelli Janet
McMaster University, Canada.
J Fam Nurs. 2007 Feb;13(1):83-98. doi: 10.1177/1074840706297789.
Improved disease management in children has resulted in an increased interest in the quality of life in children. Quality of life research in children may enlist either the substitute or complementary perspective. Much of the quality of life literature has been guided by the substitute perspective, which infers that parents may best report their child's quality of life. However, the complementary perspective values both parent and child perspectives equally. The purpose of this article was to critically review the quality of life literature with respect to children with diabetes. Limitations in the literature were addressed as conceptual and methodological, demographic, and underlying proxy perspectives. Benefits and limitations of quality of life measurements and perspectives were also discussed. Recommendations and future implications for quality of life research in children extend current understanding from both substitute and complementary perspectives.
儿童疾病管理的改善使得人们对儿童生活质量的关注度不断提高。儿童生活质量研究可以采用替代视角或补充视角。许多生活质量文献都受到替代视角的指导,该视角认为父母最能报告孩子的生活质量。然而,补充视角同等重视父母和孩子的观点。本文的目的是对糖尿病儿童生活质量文献进行批判性综述。文献中的局限性包括概念和方法、人口统计学以及潜在的替代视角等方面。还讨论了生活质量测量和视角的益处与局限性。儿童生活质量研究的建议和未来影响从替代和补充两个视角拓展了当前的认识。