Sotero Roberto C, Trujillo-Barreto Nelson J
Cuban Neuroscience Center, Ave. 25, Esq. 158, No. 15202, Cubanacan, Playa, Ciudad Habana, P.O. Box 6412/6414, Cuba.
Neuroimage. 2007 Mar;35(1):149-65. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.027. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
A biophysical model of the coupling between neuronal activity and the BOLD signal that allows for explicitly evaluating the role of both excitatory and inhibitory activity is formulated in this paper. The model is based on several physiological assumptions. Firstly, in addition to glycolysis, the "glycogen shunt" is assumed for excitatory synapses as a mechanism for energy production in the astrocytes. As a result, oxygen-to-glucose index (OGI) is not constant but varies with excitatory neuronal activity. In contrast, a constant OGI=6 (glycolysis) is assumed for inhibitory synapses. Finally we assume that cerebral blood flow is not directly controlled by energy usage, but it is only related to excitatory activity. Simulations' results show that increases in excitatory activity amplify the oscillations associated with the transient BOLD response, by increasing the initial dip, the maximum, and the post-stimulus undershoot of the signal. In contrast, increasing the inhibitory activity evoked an overall decrease of the BOLD signal along the whole time interval of the response. Simultaneous increase of both types of activity is then expected to reinforce the initial dip and the post-stimulus undershoot, while respective effects on the maximum tend to counteract each other. Two mechanisms for negative BOLD response (NBS) generation were predicted by the model: (i) when inhibition was present alone or together with low activation levels and (ii) when deactivation occurred independently of the accompanying inhibition level. Interestingly, NBS was associated with negative oxygen consumption changes only for the case of mechanism (ii).
本文构建了一个神经元活动与血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号耦合的生物物理模型,该模型能够明确评估兴奋性和抑制性活动的作用。该模型基于若干生理学假设。首先,除糖酵解外,兴奋性突触假定存在“糖原分流”,作为星形胶质细胞中能量产生的一种机制。因此,氧葡萄糖指数(OGI)并非恒定不变,而是随兴奋性神经元活动而变化。相比之下,抑制性突触假定OGI恒定为6(糖酵解)。最后,我们假定脑血流量并非直接受能量消耗控制,而是仅与兴奋性活动相关。模拟结果表明,兴奋性活动的增加会通过增加信号的初始下降、最大值和刺激后下冲,放大与瞬态BOLD反应相关的振荡。相反,增加抑制性活动会使BOLD信号在反应的整个时间间隔内总体下降。那么,两种类型活动的同时增加预计会增强初始下降和刺激后下冲,而对最大值的各自影响往往相互抵消。该模型预测了负BOLD反应(NBS)产生的两种机制:(i)当单独存在抑制或与低激活水平同时存在时,以及(ii)当失活独立于伴随的抑制水平发生时。有趣的是,仅在机制(ii)的情况下,NBS与负氧消耗变化相关。