Hatton Randy C, Winterstein Almut G, McKelvey Russell P, Shuster Jonathan, Hendeles Leslie
Drug Information and Pharmacy Resource Center, Shands at the University of Florida, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2007 Mar;41(3):381-90. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H679. Epub 2007 Jan 30.
Oral phenylephrine is used as a decongestant, yet there has been no previously published systematic review supporting its efficacy and safety.
To assess the efficacy and safety of oral phenylephrine as a nonprescription decongestant.
MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and the Federal Register were searched for English and non-English-language studies published through January 2007 that measured the effects of oral phenylephrine on nasal airway resistance (NAR) in patients with nasal congestion. The retrieved studies were supplemented with information from our personal files and by hand searches of the references in any of the studies. Additionally, a Web of Science Search was conducted using the Cited Reference function for all published clinical trials identified. Studies included in the analysis were randomized, placebo-controlled trials; studies of combination products were excluded. Two investigators independently extracted data on NAR, self-reported decongestant effects, and cardiovascular effects (ie, heart rate, blood pressure) from each of the included studies. Meta-analyses were performed for NAR and cardiovascular effects using a random effects model. Subjective decongestant effects were summarized.
Based on 8 unpublished studies that included 138 patients, phenylephrine 10 mg did not affect NAR more than placebo; the mean maximal difference in relative change from baseline between phenylephrine and placebo was 10.1% (95% CI -3.8% to 23.9%). Eight unpublished studies on phenylephrine 25 mg showed a significant reduction of maximal NAR compared with placebo of 27.6% (95% CI 17.5% to 37.7%). There was significant heterogeneity among the studies included in this analysis, which was partially attributable to different laboratories and methods used. Patient-reported decongestion was not consistently better for any phenylephrine dose compared with placebo, and NAR was a more sensitive measurement of efficacy. Phenylephrine showed no consistent effect on heart rate or blood pressure for doses of 25 mg or less.
There is insufficient evidence that oral phenylephrine is effective for nonprescription use as a decongestant. The Food and Drug Administration should require additional studies to show the safety and efficacy of phenylephrine.
口服去氧肾上腺素用作减充血剂,但此前尚无已发表的系统性综述支持其有效性和安全性。
评估口服去氧肾上腺素作为非处方减充血剂的有效性和安全性。
检索MEDLINE、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、EMBASE、国际药学文摘和联邦公报,查找截至2007年1月发表的英文和非英文研究,这些研究测量了口服去氧肾上腺素对鼻塞患者鼻气道阻力(NAR)的影响。通过个人文件中的信息以及对任何研究中的参考文献进行手工检索来补充检索到的研究。此外,使用被引参考文献功能对所有已发表的临床试验进行了Web of Science搜索。纳入分析的研究为随机、安慰剂对照试验;排除联合产品的研究。两名研究人员独立从每项纳入研究中提取关于NAR、自我报告的减充血效果和心血管效应(即心率、血压)的数据。使用随机效应模型对NAR和心血管效应进行荟萃分析。总结主观减充血效果。
基于8项未发表的研究(包括138名患者),10毫克去氧肾上腺素对NAR的影响并不比安慰剂更大;去氧肾上腺素与安慰剂相比,从基线开始的相对变化的平均最大差异为10.1%(95%可信区间为-3.8%至23.9%)。8项关于25毫克去氧肾上腺素的未发表研究表明,与安慰剂相比,最大NAR显著降低了27.6%(95%可信区间为17.5%至37.7%)。该分析中纳入的研究之间存在显著异质性,部分原因是使用了不同的实验室和方法。与安慰剂相比,患者报告的任何去氧肾上腺素剂量的减充血效果并不始终更好,并且NAR是更敏感的疗效测量指标。对于25毫克或更低剂量的去氧肾上腺素,其对心率或血压没有一致的影响。
没有足够的证据表明口服去氧肾上腺素作为非处方减充血剂是有效的。美国食品药品监督管理局应要求进行更多研究以证明去氧肾上腺素的安全性和有效性。