Suppr超能文献

接受口服化疗与静脉化疗的可手术结肠癌患者的生活质量:来自国家外科辅助乳腺和肠道项目试验C-06的结果。

Quality of life in operable colon cancer patients receiving oral compared with intravenous chemotherapy: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Trial C-06.

作者信息

Kopec Jacek A, Yothers Greg, Ganz Patricia A, Land Stephanie R, Cecchini Reena S, Wieand H Samuel, Lembersky Barry C, Wolmark Norman

机构信息

National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 1;25(4):424-30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2597.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We compared health-related quality of life (HRQL), symptoms, and convenience of care (COC) in patients with stage II/III carcinoma of the colon who received either oral uracil/ftorafur (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV) or standard intravenous (IV) fluorouracil (FU) plus LV as adjuvant chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We measured HRQL with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) questionnaire, Short Form-36 Vitality Scale (SF-36), and a Quality of Life Rating Scale (QLRS) at baseline, once during chemotherapy, and at 1 year. We used the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS) and treatment-specific Symptom Checklist (SCL) to assess symptoms and a modified Burden of Care form to assess COC at baseline, on day 1 of each treatment cycle, and at 1 year. Repeated measures analyses controlling for demographic variables and baseline scores were used for statistical comparisons.

RESULTS

The study accrued 1,608 patients, 803 to the FU arm and 805 to the UFT arm. There were no differences between the arms in overall FACT-C scores, FACT-C scores within the subscales of colon-specific, physical, emotional, social, and functional health, or QLRS scores. Patients taking UFT reported substantially higher COC. Statistically significant but small differences were observed for SF-36, favoring FU, and for SDS and SCL, both favoring UFT.

CONCLUSION

Patients perceive adjuvant treatment with UFT + LV as more convenient than standard IV treatment with FU + LV. Both regimens are well tolerated and do not differ in their impact on HRQL.

摘要

目的

我们比较了接受口服尿嘧啶/替加氟(UFT)加亚叶酸钙(LV)或标准静脉注射(IV)氟尿嘧啶(FU)加LV作为辅助化疗的II/III期结肠癌患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQL)、症状和护理便利性(COC)。

患者与方法

我们在基线、化疗期间一次以及1年时,使用癌症治疗功能评估-结直肠癌(FACT-C)问卷、简短健康调查问卷36项活力量表(SF-36)和生活质量评定量表(QLRS)来测量HRQL。我们使用症状困扰量表(SDS)和特定治疗症状清单(SCL)来评估症状,并使用改良的护理负担表在基线、每个治疗周期的第1天和1年时评估COC。采用重复测量分析控制人口统计学变量和基线分数进行统计比较。

结果

该研究纳入了1608例患者,803例进入FU组,805例进入UFT组。两组在总体FACT-C评分、结肠特异性、身体、情感、社会和功能健康子量表内的FACT-C评分或QLRS评分方面没有差异。服用UFT的患者报告的COC显著更高。在SF-36方面观察到具有统计学意义但较小的差异,有利于FU,而在SDS和SCL方面,两者均有利于UFT。

结论

患者认为UFT + LV辅助治疗比标准IV FU + LV治疗更方便。两种方案耐受性良好,对HRQL的影响无差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验