Mayer Joni A, Slymen Donald J, Clapp Elizabeth J, Pichon Latrice C, Eckhardt Laura, Eichenfield Lawrence F, Elder John P, Sallis James F, Weinstock Martin A, Achter April, Balderrama Cynthia, Galindo Gabriel R, Oh Sam S
Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego 92123, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2007 Mar;97(3):559-65. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.083907. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
We examined whether US Postal Service letter carriers who received a sun safety intervention would wear wide-brim hats and sunscreen significantly more often than those who did not receive the intervention.
We used a 2-group randomized design with 2662 evaluation cohort participants from 70 US postal stations. Evaluations were conducted at baseline, 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Questionnaire items assessed occupational use of sun-screen and wide-brim hats. The 2-year sun safety intervention included the provision of wide-brim hats, accessible sunscreen, reminders, and 6 educational sessions.
At the 3-month follow-up evaluations, the odds ratio (OR) for regular sun-screen use was 2.8 times higher among the intervention group than among the control group (95% confidence interval [CI]=2.2, 3.5); at the 2-year follow-up evaluations, the rate was still significantly higher (OR=2.0; 95% CI=1.6, 2.6). Intervention group participants also had significantly higher rates of hat use, with the differences remaining consistent across all follow-ups (OR=2.9; 95% CI=2.3, 3.6).
The intervention should be disseminated to postal stations nationwide and possibly to other occupational groups that work outdoors.
我们研究了接受防晒干预的美国邮政信件投递员是否比未接受干预的投递员更频繁地佩戴宽边帽和涂抹防晒霜。
我们采用两组随机设计,来自70个美国邮政站的2662名评估队列参与者参与其中。在基线、3个月、1年和2年时进行评估。问卷项目评估了防晒霜和宽边帽的职业使用情况。为期两年的防晒干预包括提供宽边帽、可获取的防晒霜、提醒信息以及6次教育课程。
在3个月的随访评估中,干预组经常使用防晒霜的优势比(OR)比对照组高2.8倍(95%置信区间[CI]=2.2, 3.5);在2年的随访评估中,该比率仍然显著更高(OR=2.0;95% CI=1.6, 2.6)。干预组参与者佩戴帽子的比率也显著更高,在所有随访中差异保持一致(OR=2.9;95% CI=2.3, 3.6)。
该干预措施应推广至全国的邮政站,并可能推广至其他户外工作的职业群体。