Nicoladis Elena, Palmer Andrea, Marentette Paula
Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Canada.
Dev Sci. 2007 Mar;10(2):237-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00582.x.
Type and token frequency have been thought to be important in the acquisition of past tense morphology, particularly in differentiating regular and irregular forms. In this study we tested the role of frequency in two ways: (1) in bilingual children, who typically use and hear either language less often than monolingual children and (2) cross-linguistically: French and English have different patterns of frequency of regular/irregular verbs. Ten French-English bilingual children, 10 French monolingual and 10 English monolingual children between 4 and 6 years watched a cartoon and re-told the story. The results demonstrated that the bilingual children were less accurate than the monolingual children. Their accuracy in both French and English regular and irregular verbs corresponded to frequency in the input language. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that children learn past tense morphemes by analogy with other words in their vocabularies. We propose a developmental sequence based on conservative generalization across a growing set of verbs.
词型和词频被认为在过去时形态的习得中很重要,尤其是在区分规则形式和不规则形式方面。在本研究中,我们通过两种方式测试了频率的作用:(1)在双语儿童中,他们通常使用和听到每种语言的频率都比单语儿童低;(2)跨语言研究:法语和英语的规则/不规则动词频率模式不同。10名4至6岁的法英双语儿童、10名法语单语儿童和10名英语单语儿童观看了一部卡通片并复述故事。结果表明,双语儿童的准确性不如单语儿童。他们在法语和英语的规则和不规则动词方面的准确性与输入语言中的频率相对应。这些结果与儿童通过类比其词汇表中的其他单词来学习过去时语素的假设一致。我们提出了一个基于对越来越多动词进行保守概括的发展序列。