Paradis Johanne, Nicoladis Elena, Crago Martha, Genesee Fred
University of Alberta.
Dalhousie University.
J Child Lang. 2011 Jun;38(3):554-78. doi: 10.1017/S0305000910000218. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
Bilingual and monolingual children's (mean age=4;10) elicited production of the past tense in both English and French was examined in order to test predictions from Usage-Based theory regarding the sensitivity of children's acquisition rates to input factors such as variation in exposure time and the type/token frequency of morphosyntactic structures. Both bilingual and monolingual children were less accurate with irregular than regular past tense forms in both languages. Bilingual children, as a group, were less accurate than monolinguals with the English regular and irregular past tense, and with the French irregular past tense, but not with the French regular past tense. However, bilingual children were as accurate as monolinguals with the past tense in their language of greater exposure, except for English irregular verbs. It is argued that these results support the view that children's acquisition rates are sensitive to input factors, but with some qualifications.
为了检验基于用法理论中关于儿童习得率对输入因素(如接触时间的变化以及形态句法结构的类型/实例频率)的敏感性的预测,对双语和单语儿童(平均年龄 = 4岁10个月)在英语和法语中过去时的诱发产出进行了研究。在这两种语言中,双语和单语儿童对不规则过去时形式的准确性都低于规则过去时形式。总体而言,双语儿童在英语规则和不规则过去时以及法语不规则过去时方面的准确性低于单语儿童,但在法语规则过去时方面并非如此。然而,除了英语不规则动词外,双语儿童在接触更多的语言中过去时的准确性与单语儿童相当。有人认为,这些结果支持了儿童习得率对输入因素敏感的观点,但有一些限定条件。