Tielemans Erik, Bretveld Reini, Schinkel Jody, Van Wendel De Joode Berna, Kromhout Hans, Gerritsen-Ebben Rianda, Roeleveld Nel, Preller Liesbeth
Business Unit Quality & Safety, TNO Quality of Life, Zeist, AJ Zeist, The Netherlands.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;17(6):501-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500544. Epub 2007 Feb 14.
The aim of this study was to assess exposure to pesticides for a longitudinal epidemiological study on adverse reproduction effects among greenhouse workers. Detailed information on pesticide use among greenhouse workers was obtained on a monthly basis through self-administered questionnaires and subsequent workplace surveys. Questionnaires were filled in for a whole year. Dermal exposure rankings were developed for each task using the observational method Dermal Exposure Assessment Method (DREAM). Exposure scores were calculated for each worker for each month during the year, taking into account frequency, duration and exposure intensity for each task. A total number of 116 different active ingredients were used in the population, whereas a mean number of 15 active ingredients were applied per greenhouse. DREAM observations provided insight into the exposure intensity of 12 application techniques and three mixing and loading activities. Relatively high DREAM scores were obtained for scattering, fogging, dusting, and mixing and loading of powders. Observations with DREAM indicated that application with a horizontal ground-boom, motor driven boom, and bulb shower resulted in low dermal exposure. Exposure scores showed substantial variation between workers and over the year. It can be concluded that exposure variation between- and within greenhouses is very large, both in terms of chemical composition and exposure intensity. This may be a significant contributor to the inconsistent results of studies evaluating health effects of pesticide exposure.
本研究的目的是评估温室工人不良生殖效应纵向流行病学研究中的农药暴露情况。通过自我填写问卷及后续的工作场所调查,每月获取温室工人农药使用的详细信息。问卷填写时长为一整年。使用皮肤暴露评估方法(DREAM)的观察法为每项任务制定皮肤暴露等级。在考虑每项任务的频率、持续时间和暴露强度的情况下,计算出每位工人全年每月的暴露分数。研究人群中共使用了116种不同的活性成分,而每个温室平均使用15种活性成分。DREAM观察提供了对12种施药技术以及三种混合和装载活动的暴露强度的深入了解。在撒施、喷雾、喷粉以及粉末的混合和装载过程中获得了相对较高的DREAM分数。DREAM观察表明,使用水平地面喷杆、机动喷杆和喷头淋浴进行施药时,皮肤暴露较低。暴露分数在工人之间以及全年中存在很大差异。可以得出结论,无论是在化学成分还是暴露强度方面,温室之间和温室内的暴露差异都非常大。这可能是评估农药暴露健康影响的研究结果不一致的一个重要原因。