de Vries Marjolein P, van den Bemt Lisette, Aretz Karen, Thoonen Bart P A, Muris Jean W M, Kester Arnold D M, Cloosterman Sonja, van Schayck C P Onno
Department of General Practice, Research Institute Caphri, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Mar;57(536):184-90.
The efficacy of bed covers that are impermeable to house dust mites has been disputed.
The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the combination of 'house dust mite impermeable' covers and a self-management plan, based on peak flow values and symptoms, leads to reduced use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) than self-management alone.
Prospective, randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Primary care in a south-eastern region of the Netherlands.
Asthma patients aged between 16 and 60 years with a house dust mite allergy requiring ICS were randomised to intervention and placebo groups. They were trained to use a self-management plan based on peak flow and symptoms. After a 3-month training period, the intervention commenced using house dust mite impermeable and placebo bed covers. The follow-up period was 2 years. Primary outcome was the use of ICS; secondary outcomes were peak expiratory flow parameters, asthma control, and symptoms.
One hundred and twenty-six patients started the intervention with house dust mite impermeable or placebo bed covers. After 1 and 2 years, significant differences in allergen exposure were found between the intervention and control groups (P<0.001). No significant difference between the intervention and control groups was found in the dose of ICS (P = 0.08), morning peak flow (P = 0.52), peak flow variability (P = 0.36), dyspnoea (P = 0.46), wheezing (P = 0.77), or coughing (P = 0.41). There was no difference in asthma control between the intervention and control groups.
House dust mite impermeable bed covers combined with self-management do not lead to reduced use of ICS compared with self-management alone.
对尘螨不可渗透的床罩的功效一直存在争议。
本研究的目的是调查“尘螨不可渗透”床罩与基于峰值流量值和症状的自我管理计划相结合,是否比单独的自我管理导致吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)的使用减少。
前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
荷兰东南部地区的初级保健机构。
年龄在16至60岁之间、对尘螨过敏且需要使用ICS的哮喘患者被随机分为干预组和安慰剂组。他们接受了基于峰值流量和症状的自我管理计划的培训。经过3个月的培训期后,干预组开始使用尘螨不可渗透的床罩和安慰剂床罩。随访期为2年。主要结局是ICS的使用情况;次要结局是呼气峰值流量参数、哮喘控制情况和症状。
126名患者开始使用尘螨不可渗透或安慰剂床罩进行干预。1年和2年后,干预组和对照组之间在过敏原暴露方面存在显著差异(P<0.001)。干预组和对照组在ICS剂量(P = 0.08)、早晨峰值流量(P = 0.52)、峰值流量变异性(P = 0.36)、呼吸困难(P = 0.46)、喘息(P = 0.77)或咳嗽(P = 0.41)方面未发现显著差异。干预组和对照组在哮喘控制方面没有差异。
与单独的自我管理相比,尘螨不可渗透的床罩与自我管理相结合并不会导致ICS使用减少。