Beckers E J, Leiper J B, Davidson J
Department of Human Biology, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Gut. 1992 Jan;33(1):115-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.33.1.115.
A comparison was made of two techniques to measure the rate of gastric emptying. A noninvasive scintigraphic technique using a gammacamera and an invasive aspiration technique based on dye dilution were performed simultaneously. Seven healthy male volunteers each consumed two different liquid meals on two separate occasions. Scintigraphic measurements were performed continuously with aspiration every 10 minutes for a total of one hour. Gastric emptying rates were expressed as slope values after semilog linearisation of the emptying curves. Agreement between the two methods was assessed from the individual differences and mean of the two techniques, as well as from the geometric mean, including 95% limits of agreement. The scintigraphic technique gave a 70% slower emptying rate than the dye dilution technique. However, the 95% limits of agreement are large (1.56 to 0.30), reflecting the small sample size and the large coefficient of variation in the techniques used.
对两种测量胃排空速率的技术进行了比较。同时采用了一种使用γ相机的非侵入性闪烁扫描技术和一种基于染料稀释的侵入性抽吸技术。七名健康男性志愿者在两个不同的场合分别食用了两种不同的流食。闪烁扫描测量连续进行,每10分钟进行一次抽吸,共持续一小时。胃排空速率以排空曲线经半对数线性化后的斜率值表示。通过两种技术的个体差异和均值以及几何均值(包括95%一致性界限)来评估两种方法之间的一致性。闪烁扫描技术得出的排空速率比染料稀释技术慢70%。然而,95%一致性界限范围较大(1.56至0.30),这反映了样本量较小以及所使用技术的变异系数较大。