Suppr超能文献

危重症新生儿和儿童脓毒症中的脂多糖结合蛋白、脂多糖及可溶性CD14

Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, lipopolysaccharide, and soluble CD14 in sepsis of critically ill neonates and children.

作者信息

Pavcnik-Arnol Maja, Hojker Sergej, Derganc Metka

机构信息

University Medical Center Ljubljana, Department of Pediatric Surgery and Intensive Care, Zaloska 7, 1525 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jun;33(6):1025-32. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0626-y. Epub 2007 Apr 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) for sepsis in critically ill neonates and children with the two markers participating in the same inflammatory pathway, lipopolysaccharide and soluble CD14.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective, observational study in a multidisciplinary neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

47 critically ill neonates and 49 critically ill children with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and suspected sepsis, classified into two groups: those with and those without sepsis.

INTERVENTIONS

Serum LBP, lipopolysaccharide, soluble CD14, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin were measured on 2 consecutive days. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were evaluated.

RESULTS

AUC for LBP on the first day of suspected infection was 0.97 in neonates aged under 48 h, 0.93 in neonates over 48 h and 0.82 in children. AUCs for lipopolysaccharide and soluble CD14 were 0.77 and 0.74 in neonates under 48 h, 0.53 and 0.76 in neonates over 48 h, and 0.72 and 0.53 in children. AUCs for procalcitonin and C-reactive protein were 0.65 and 0.89 in neonates under 48 h, 0.65 and 0.91 in neonates over 48 h, and 0.76 and 0.69 in children.

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill neonates and children LBP concentration on the first day of suspected sepsis is a better marker of sepsis than lipopolysaccharide, soluble CD14, procalcitonin, and in neonates younger than 48 h and children, also a better marker than C-reactive protein. Lipopolysaccharide and soluble CD14 are not suitable markers for the differentiation of infectious and noninfectious SIRS.

摘要

目的

比较脂多糖结合蛋白(LBP)与参与同一炎症途径的两种标志物脂多糖和可溶性CD14对危重新生儿和儿童败血症的诊断准确性。

设计与地点

在多学科新生儿和儿科重症监护病房进行的前瞻性观察研究。

患者

47例危重新生儿和49例患有全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)且疑似败血症的危重症儿童,分为两组:有败血症组和无败血症组。

干预措施

连续两天检测血清LBP、脂多糖、可溶性CD14、C反应蛋白和降钙素原。评估受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积、敏感性、特异性和预测值。

结果

疑似感染第一天LBP的AUC在48小时以下的新生儿中为0.97,48小时以上的新生儿中为0.93,儿童中为0.82。脂多糖和可溶性CD14的AUC在48小时以下的新生儿中分别为0.77和0.74,48小时以上的新生儿中分别为0.53和0.76,儿童中分别为0.72和0.53。降钙素原和C反应蛋白的AUC在48小时以下的新生儿中分别为0.65和0.89,48小时以上的新生儿中分别为0.65和0.91,儿童中分别为0.76和0.69。

结论

在危重新生儿和儿童中,疑似败血症第一天的LBP浓度比脂多糖、可溶性CD14、降钙素原是更好的败血症标志物,在48小时以下的新生儿和儿童中,也比C反应蛋白是更好的标志物。脂多糖和可溶性CD14不是区分感染性和非感染性SIRS的合适标志物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验