• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对非正式中风照护者的干预措施的荟萃分析。

A meta-analysis of interventions for informal stroke caregivers.

作者信息

Lee JuHee, Soeken Karen, Picot Sandra J

机构信息

University of Maryland School of Nursing, 655 W. Lombard Street, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

West J Nurs Res. 2007 Apr;29(3):344-56; discussion 357-364. doi: 10.1177/0193945906296564.

DOI:10.1177/0193945906296564
PMID:17420524
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of the interventions for improving mental health of caregivers of people with stroke by synthesizing individual studies. A meta-analysis was performed to summarize findings of intervention studies of caregivers of elderly stroke patients. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis and a publication bias were tested. The overall mean weighted effect size (MWES) for the four studies is 0.277 (Z = 3.432, p = .001) with a 95% CI .118 to .435 (N = 718) indicating that the intervention was effective in improving the mental health of informal stroke caregivers. The MWES for the education program was 0.354 (Z= 2.613, p < .01) and for the support program was .234 (Z = 2.335, p= .02). The MWES for the Europe study was .219 (Z= 2.613, p < .01) and for the United States was .922 (Z = 3.287, p = .001). The results show that overall interventions improved mental health of informal stroke caregivers. The small number of studies included in the meta-analysis limits the generalizability of results while supporting the need for more research in this area.

摘要

本研究的目的是通过综合个体研究来检验改善中风患者照料者心理健康的干预措施的有效性。进行了一项荟萃分析,以总结老年中风患者照料者干预研究的结果。此外,还进行了敏感性分析和发表偏倚检验。四项研究的总体平均加权效应量(MWES)为0.277(Z = 3.432,p = .001),95%置信区间为.118至.435(N = 718),表明该干预措施在改善中风非正式照料者的心理健康方面是有效的。教育项目的MWES为0.354(Z = 2.613,p < .01),支持项目的MWES为.234(Z = 2.335,p = .02)。欧洲研究的MWES为.219(Z = 2.613,p < .01),美国研究的MWES为.922(Z = 3.287,p = .001)。结果表明,总体干预措施改善了中风非正式照料者的心理健康。荟萃分析中纳入的研究数量较少,限制了结果的普遍性,同时也支持了在该领域开展更多研究的必要性。

相似文献

1
A meta-analysis of interventions for informal stroke caregivers.针对非正式中风照护者的干预措施的荟萃分析。
West J Nurs Res. 2007 Apr;29(3):344-56; discussion 357-364. doi: 10.1177/0193945906296564.
2
The impact of a nurse-led support and education programme for spouses of stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.一项针对中风患者配偶的由护士主导的支持与教育项目的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Sep;14(8):995-1003. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01206.x.
3
Psychosocial intervention for family caregivers of people with dementia reduces caregiver's burden: development and effect after 6 and 12 months.针对痴呆症患者家庭照顾者的心理社会干预可减轻照顾者负担:干预措施的制定及其在6个月和12个月后的效果
Scand J Caring Sci. 2008 Mar;22(1):98-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00498.x.
4
Cancer care: impact of interventions on caregiver outcomes.癌症护理:干预措施对照料者结局的影响。
Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2000;18:127-48.
5
Stroke care in the home: the impact of social support on the general health of family caregivers.家庭中风护理:社会支持对家庭护理人员总体健康的影响。
J Clin Nurs. 2004 Oct;13(7):816-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00943.x.
6
Barriers and facilitators to caring for individuals with stroke in the community: the family's experience.社区中照顾中风患者的障碍与促进因素:家庭的经历。
Can J Neurosci Nurs. 2007;29(2):5-12.
7
Stroke: the increasing complexity of carer needs.中风:护理需求日益复杂。
J Neurosci Nurs. 2007 Jun;39(3):172-9.
8
Intervention studies for caregivers of stroke survivors: a critical review.针对中风幸存者照料者的干预研究:一项批判性综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Mar;56(3):257-67. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.02.013.
9
Lives on hold: evaluation of a caregiver's support program.生活暂停:一项照顾者支持项目的评估
Home Healthc Nurse. 1998 Jul;16(7):465-72.
10
[Informal caregivers of elderly people in South Tyrol. A qualitative assessment of home care situation].[南蒂罗尔地区老年人的非正式照料者。家庭护理状况的定性评估]
Pflege Z. 2009 Nov;62(11):678-82.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Determinants of Health: Underreported Heterogeneity in Systematic Reviews of Caregiver Interventions.社会决定因素与健康:照顾者干预措施系统评价中被低估的异质性。
Gerontologist. 2020 Feb 14;60(Suppl 1):S14-S28. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz148.
2
Physical Activity Intervention Effects on Physical Function Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.体力活动干预对社区居住老年人身体功能的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Aging Phys Act. 2017 Jan;25(1):149-170. doi: 10.1123/japa.2016-0040. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
3
Reducing depression in stroke survivors and their informal caregivers: a randomized clinical trial of a Web-based intervention.
减少中风幸存者及其非正式照顾者的抑郁:一项基于网络的干预措施的随机临床试验。
Rehabil Psychol. 2012 Aug;57(3):196-206. doi: 10.1037/a0029587.
4
Using meta-analyses for comparative effectiveness research.使用荟萃分析进行比较有效性研究。
Nurs Outlook. 2012 Jul-Aug;60(4):182-90. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2012.04.004.
5
Stroke caregiver outcomes from the Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit (TASK).电话评估与技能培养工具包(TASK)对中风患者照料者的影响。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):105-21. doi: 10.1310/tsr1602-105.
6
Problems and benefits reported by stroke family caregivers: results from a prospective epidemiological study.中风患者家庭照顾者报告的问题与益处:一项前瞻性流行病学研究的结果
Stroke. 2009 Jun;40(6):2129-33. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.545269. Epub 2009 Apr 30.