• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
What are the essential elements to enable patient participation in medical decision making?使患者能够参与医疗决策的关键要素有哪些?
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 May;22(5):614-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0149-9.
2
Understanding behavioral intent to participate in shared decision-making in medically uncertain situations.理解在医学情况不确定时参与共同决策的行为意图。
Methods Inf Med. 2012;51(4):301-8. doi: 10.3414/ME11-01-0077. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
3
Exploring Provider Reactions to Decision Aid Distribution and Shared Decision Making: Lessons from Two Specialties.探索医疗服务提供者对决策辅助工具分发及共同决策的反应:来自两个专业领域的经验教训。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jan;37(1):113-126. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16671933. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
4
Perceived involvement and preferences in shared decision-making among patients with hypertension.高血压患者对共同决策的感知参与度和偏好
Fam Pract. 2016 Jun;33(3):296-301. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw012. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
5
Health beliefs and expectations implicit in decision-making in a Hong Kong Chinese surgical population.香港华裔外科手术人群决策中隐含的健康信念和期望。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Mar;16(3):603-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01572.x.
6
[Shared decision making: an approach to strengthening patient participation in rehabilitation].[共同决策:增强患者参与康复的一种方法]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003 Jun;42(3):129-35. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40097.
7
The Experience of Surrogate Decision Makers on Being Approached for Consent for Patient Participation in Research. A Multicenter Study.代理决策者在被征求患者参与研究同意时的经历。一项多中心研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Feb;14(2):238-245. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201606-425OC.
8
Exploring patient involvement in healthcare decision making across different education and functional health literacy groups.探讨不同教育程度和功能性健康素养群体中患者在医疗决策中的参与情况。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Dec;69(12):1805-12. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.056. Epub 2009 Oct 19.
9
Participation in medical decision making: the patients' perspective.参与医疗决策:患者视角
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):533-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07306784. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
10
Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice.共同决策:概念、证据与实践。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Oct;98(10):1172-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.022. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a patient decision aid for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a patient-centered approach.2型糖尿病患者决策辅助工具的开发:以患者为中心的方法。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Mar 22;26(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02772-7.
2
Person-centred care during treatment with nasal esketamine - a qualitative study.鼻内艾司氯胺酮治疗期间的以患者为中心的护理——一项定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Mar 14;24(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02943-y.
3
Engaging Patients in Discussions About Medication Deprescribing.让患者参与关于减药的讨论。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jan 29. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09346-w.
4
Communication barriers to optimal access to emergency rooms according to deaf and hard-of-hearing patients and health care workers: A mixed-methods study.根据失聪和听力障碍患者及医护人员的情况分析通往急诊室的最佳途径中的沟通障碍:一项混合方法研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;32(3):246-259. doi: 10.1111/acem.15037. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
5
How Social Connectedness Helps Patients Stay Home After Hospital at Home Enrollment: A Mixed Methods Study.社会联系如何帮助患者在居家住院后留在家里:一项混合方法研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Nov;39(14):2671-2678. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08785-9. Epub 2024 May 9.
6
From precision medicine to precision care: Choosing and using precision medicine in the context of multimorbidity.从精准医学到精准照护:在共病背景下选择和使用精准医学
Camb Prism Precis Med. 2023 Feb 21;1:e19. doi: 10.1017/pcm.2023.8. eCollection 2023.
7
Self-efficacy of advanced cancer patients for participation in treatment-related decision-making in six European countries: the ACTION study.晚期癌症患者在六个欧洲国家参与治疗相关决策的自我效能感:ACTION 研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Aug 8;31(9):512. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07974-2.
8
"Why Do We Always Have to Focus on the Bad": A Strengths-Based Approach to Identify the Positive Aspects of Care From the Perspective of Older Adults Using a Secondary Qualitative Analysis.“为何我们总是不得不关注负面情况”:一种基于优势的方法,通过二次定性分析从老年人的视角识别护理中的积极方面
J Patient Exp. 2023 Aug 2;10:23743735231188841. doi: 10.1177/23743735231188841. eCollection 2023.
9
Identifying Womens' Needs in Making a Treatment Decision for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Qualitative Study.确定女性在压力性尿失禁治疗决策中的需求:一项定性研究。
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2023 Jul 18;4(1):358-366. doi: 10.1089/whr.2023.0002. eCollection 2023.
10
Experiences with cross-sectional healthcare and treatment in heart failure patients: implications for medical education.心力衰竭患者的横断面医疗保健和治疗经验:对医学教育的启示。
Int J Med Educ. 2022 Dec 30;13:345-362. doi: 10.5116/ijme.6399.eef4.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient treatment preferences for osteoporosis.骨质疏松症患者的治疗偏好
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Oct 15;55(5):729-35. doi: 10.1002/art.22229.
2
Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others.患者在医疗会诊中的参与度:为何有些患者比其他患者参与度更高。
Med Care. 2005 Oct;43(10):960-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000178172.40344.70.
3
Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences.并非所有患者都希望参与决策制定。一项关于公众偏好的全国性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jun;20(6):531-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04101.x.
4
Shared medical decision making: problems, process, progress.共同医疗决策:问题、过程与进展
JAMA. 2004 Nov 24;292(20):2516-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.20.2516.
5
How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision-making?信任如何影响患者参与决策的偏好?
Health Expect. 2004 Dec;7(4):317-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00296.x.
6
A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent.共同决策、知情同意和简单同意的类型学
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jan 6;140(1):54-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-1-200401060-00012.
7
Participatory patient-physician communication and morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.系统性红斑狼疮患者中参与式医患沟通与发病率
Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Dec 15;49(6):810-8. doi: 10.1002/art.11467.
8
The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions--challenges for doctors.患者偏好对治疗决策的重要性——医生面临的挑战。
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):542-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.542.
9
Provider-patient interaction in diabetes care: effects on patient self-care and outcomes. A systematic review.糖尿病护理中的医患互动:对患者自我护理及预后的影响。一项系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Sep;51(1):17-28. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00122-2.
10
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.

使患者能够参与医疗决策的关键要素有哪些?

What are the essential elements to enable patient participation in medical decision making?

作者信息

Fraenkel Liana, McGraw Sarah

机构信息

VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2007 May;22(5):614-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0149-9.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-007-0149-9
PMID:17443368
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1855272/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient participation in shared decision making (SDM) results in increased patient knowledge, adherence, and improved outcomes. Despite the benefits of the SDM model, many patients do not attain the level of participation they desire.

OBJECTIVE

To gain a more complete understanding of the essential elements, or the prerequisites, critical to active patient participation in medical decision making from the patient's perspective.

DESIGN

Qualitative study.

SETTING

Individual, in-depth patient interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached. Two analysts independently read the transcripts and jointly developed a list of codes.

PATIENTS

Twenty-six consecutive subjects drawn from community dwelling subjects undergoing bone density measurements.

MEASUREMENTS

Respondents' experiences and beliefs related to patient participation in SDM.

RESULTS

Five elements were repeatedly described by respondents as being essential to enable patient participation in medical decision making: (1) patient knowledge, (2) explicit encouragement of patient participation by physicians, (3) appreciation of the patient's responsibility/rights to play an active role in decision making, (4) awareness of choice, and (5) time.

LIMITATIONS

The generalizability of the results is limited by the homogeneity of the study sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings have important clinical implications and suggest that several needs must be met before patients can become active participants in decisions related to their health care. These needs include ensuring that patients (1) appreciate that there is uncertainty in medicine and "buy in" to the importance of active patient participation in decisions related to their health care, (2) understand the trade-offs related to available options, and (3) have the opportunity to discuss these options with their physician to arrive at a decision concordant with their values.

摘要

背景

患者参与共同决策(SDM)可增加患者知识、提高依从性并改善治疗结果。尽管SDM模式有诸多益处,但许多患者并未达到他们期望的参与程度。

目的

从患者角度更全面地了解对患者积极参与医疗决策至关重要的基本要素或先决条件。

设计

定性研究。

设置

进行个体深入的患者访谈,直至达到主题饱和。两名分析人员独立阅读访谈记录并共同制定编码列表。

患者

从接受骨密度测量的社区居住受试者中连续选取26名受试者。

测量

受访者与患者参与SDM相关的经历和信念。

结果

受访者反复描述了五个要素,认为这些要素对患者参与医疗决策至关重要:(1)患者知识;(2)医生明确鼓励患者参与;(3)认识到患者在决策中发挥积极作用的责任/权利;(4)意识到选择;(5)时间。

局限性

研究样本的同质性限制了结果的普遍性。

结论

我们的研究结果具有重要的临床意义,表明在患者能够积极参与与其医疗保健相关的决策之前,必须满足几个需求。这些需求包括确保患者(1)认识到医学存在不确定性,并“认同”患者积极参与与其医疗保健相关决策的重要性;(2)理解与可用选项相关的权衡;(3)有机会与医生讨论这些选项,以做出符合其价值观的决策。