• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions--challenges for doctors.患者偏好对治疗决策的重要性——医生面临的挑战。
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):542-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.542.
2
Trust, social support and patient type--associations between patients perceived trust, supportive communication and patients preferences in regard to paternalism, clarification and participation of severely injured patients.信任、社会支持与患者类型——重伤患者感知到的信任、支持性沟通与患者在家长式作风、信息澄清及参与方面的偏好之间的关联
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Nov;73(2):196-204. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.016.
3
Time for humanity from doctors towards patients.医生给予患者人文关怀的时间。
Postgrad Med J. 2003 Dec;79(938):667-8.
4
The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: a taxonomy.患者参与医疗保健咨询的意义:一种分类法。
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Mar;64(6):1297-310. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.002. Epub 2006 Dec 13.
5
Paternalism and the doctor-patient relationship in general practice.全科医疗中的家长主义与医患关系
Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Aug;42(361):340-2.
6
Mediation of patient complaints.患者投诉的调解
J Ky Med Assoc. 2002 May;100(5):203.
7
Preferences for medical collaboration: patient-physician congruence and patient outcomes.医疗协作偏好:医患一致性与患者治疗结果
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jun;57(3):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.08.006.
8
Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys.患者参与临床决策的偏好:已发表调查的综述
Behav Med. 1998 Summer;24(2):81-8. doi: 10.1080/08964289809596384.
9
[Shared decision making: an approach to strengthening patient participation in rehabilitation].[共同决策:增强患者参与康复的一种方法]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003 Jun;42(3):129-35. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40097.
10
Challenges in family practice related to informed and shared decision-making: a survey of preceptors of medical students.家庭医疗中与知情和共同决策相关的挑战:一项对医学生带教老师的调查。
CMAJ. 2001 Aug 21;165(4):434-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Virtual-, Augmented- and Mixed Reality during Preoperative Informed Consent: A Systematic Review of the Literature.虚拟现实、增强现实和混合现实在术前知情同意过程中的影响:文献系统综述
J Med Syst. 2025 Jun 24;49(1):89. doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02217-9.
2
Acceptability of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in bipolar depression: thematic analysis of individual views.家庭式经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)在双相抑郁症中的可接受性:个人观点的主题分析
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 May 26;25(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06948-4.
3
Acceptability of Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Bipolar Depression: Thematic Analysis of Individual Views.家庭式经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)在双相抑郁中的可接受性:个体观点的主题分析
Res Sq. 2025 Apr 15:rs.3.rs-5967699. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5967699/v1.
4
Analysis of preferences and responses to recall in adolescent and young adult head and neck cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy.对接受放射治疗的青少年和青年头颈癌幸存者的偏好及回忆反应的分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Mar 14;33(4):281. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09340-w.
5
Factors That Influence Prescribing in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review.影响边缘型人格障碍处方的因素:一项系统综述。
Personal Ment Health. 2025 May;19(2):e70014. doi: 10.1002/pmh.70014.
6
Evaluating the Benefits and Challenges of Using Patient Preferences as a Tool for Clinical Decision Making in Oncology Multidisciplinary Team Meetings within the National Health Service: A Qualitative Study.评估在英国国家医疗服务体系下肿瘤多学科团队会议中使用患者偏好作为临床决策工具的益处与挑战:一项定性研究
Oncol Res Treat. 2025;48(5):305-311. doi: 10.1159/000543741. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
7
Medication Changes After Renal Denervation: Current Evidence and Patient Perspectives.肾去神经支配术后的药物变化:当前证据及患者观点
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Dec 17;13(24):e037187. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037187. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
8
Facilitators and barriers to decision-making for hospital treatment among patients diagnosed with breast cancer in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A qualitative urban-based study.坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆乳腺癌确诊患者医院治疗决策的促进因素和障碍:一项基于城市的定性研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Nov 7;4(11):e0003366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003366. eCollection 2024.
9
Are completed ReSPECT plans facilitating person-centred care? An evaluation of completed plans in UK general practice.已完成的《尊重计划》是否促进了以患者为中心的护理?对英国全科医疗中已完成计划的评估。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Sep 21;20:100780. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100780. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Prospectively investigating the impact of AI onshared decision-making in post kidney transplant care (PRIMA-AI): protocol for a longitudinal qualitative study among patients, their support persons and treating physicians at a tertiary care centre.前瞻性研究人工智能在肾移植后护理中的共享决策中的影响(PRIMA-AI):在一家三级护理中心对患者、其支持人员和治疗医生进行的纵向定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 1;14(10):e081318. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081318.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer patients' views and experiences of participation in care and decision making.癌症患者参与护理和决策的观点与经历。
Nurs Ethics. 2001 Mar;8(2):97-113. doi: 10.1177/096973300100800203.
2
Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures.解释风险:将数值数据转化为有意义的图表。
BMJ. 2002 Apr 6;324(7341):827-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7341.827.
3
Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care.产科护理中循证宣传册的定性研究。
BMJ. 2002 Mar 16;324(7338):639. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7338.639.
4
Patient preferences and health disparities.患者偏好与健康差异。
JAMA. 2001 Sep 26;286(12):1506-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.12.1506.
5
How do patients' treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians?患者的治疗偏好与临床医生的相比如何?
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i39-43. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100039...
6
Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences.理解风险以及关于治疗偏好的临床风险沟通的经验教训。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i9-13. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100009...
7
Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk.衡量患者对治疗的偏好和对风险的认知。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i2-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100002...
8
Engaging patients in decisions: a challenge to health care delivery and public health.让患者参与决策:对医疗服务和公共卫生的一项挑战。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i1.
9
Health care professional support for self-care management in chronic illness: insights from diabetes research.医疗保健专业人员对慢性病自我护理管理的支持:来自糖尿病研究的见解。
Patient Educ Couns. 2001 Jan;42(1):81-90. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(00)00095-1.
10
Decision-making in nephrology: shared decision making?肾脏病学中的决策:共同决策?
Patient Educ Couns. 2000 Jan;39(1):81-9. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(99)00093-2.

患者偏好对治疗决策的重要性——医生面临的挑战。

The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions--challenges for doctors.

作者信息

Say Rebecca E, Thomson Richard

机构信息

Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH.

出版信息

BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):542-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.542.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.542
PMID:12958116
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC192849/
Abstract

The expectation that patients will become increasingly involved in making treatment decisions poses new challenges for doctors. This article discusses what these are and how doctors might face them

摘要

期望患者在治疗决策中发挥越来越大的作用给医生带来了新的挑战。本文讨论了这些挑战是什么以及医生可能如何应对。