Leistner Rasmus, Wendt-Nordahl Gunnar, Grobholz Rainer, Michel Maurice Stephan, Marlinghaus Ernst, Köhrmann Kai Uwe, Alken Peter, Häcker Axel
Department of Urology, University Hospital Mannheim, Faculty of Clinical Medicine Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68135 Mannheim, Germany.
Urol Res. 2007 Aug;35(4):165-71. doi: 10.1007/s00240-007-0097-1. Epub 2007 May 5.
Storz Medical AG (Kreutzlingen/Switzerland) has developed a new electromagnetic shockwave (SW) generator, the "SLX-F2", which allows the user to choose between a small-focus, high-pressure treatment regime or a wide-focus, low-pressure option. The aim of this study was to investigate, under standardized conditions, the impact of these two different treatment regimes on SW-induced renal injury. SW-induced renal injury was investigated by using the standardized model of the perfused ex vivo kidney. SWs were applied under ultrasound control in the parenchyma of a kidney pole. Different SW numbers (20, 50, 125, 250, 500, 1,000) were applied in three groups: group A was treated with a wider focus (80 MPa), groups B (60 MPa) and C (120 MPa) with a smaller focus (each parameter setting was repeated ten-fold). Disintegration capacity (measured by crater volume in cubes of plaster of Paris) was the same in groups A and C. After SW exposure, barium sulphate suspension was perfused through the renal artery. The maximum diameter (mm) of the extravasation in the cortex, representing the extent of vascular injury, was measured on X-ray mammography films. H&E staining was performed. In all three groups (A, B, C) a higher number of SWs caused the diameter of the extravasate to increase, with statistical significance appearing at 1,000 shots versus 20 shots (p < 0.05). Vascular injury was not influenced by the focal size and positive peak pressure at identical SW numbers applied. Histology of the focal area showed gap-like defects. Our ex vivo data show that renal vascular injury is independent of the focal diameter of the SW generator at the same peak positive pressure and disintegration power. This confirms the in vivo findings that show renal injury caused by SW as being related to the number of SWs administered. Clinical studies are needed to investigate whether there is any advantage to offering both treatment regimes in one SW machine-for example, by using the "wide-focus, low-pressure" option for kidney stones and the "small-focus, high-pressure" regimen for stones in the ureter. The renal injury caused by either regime remains comparable.
斯托尔兹医疗股份公司(瑞士克罗伊茨林根)研发了一种新型电磁冲击波(SW)发生器“SLX-F2”,它可让用户在小焦点、高压治疗模式和大焦点、低压模式之间进行选择。本研究的目的是在标准化条件下,探究这两种不同治疗模式对SW诱导的肾损伤的影响。通过使用灌注离体肾脏的标准化模型来研究SW诱导的肾损伤。在超声引导下,将SW施加于肾极实质。在三组中施加不同数量的SW(20、50、125、250、500、1000):A组采用较大焦点(80兆帕)进行治疗,B组(60兆帕)和C组(120兆帕)采用较小焦点(每个参数设置重复十次)。A组和C组的破碎能力(通过巴黎石膏立方体中的弹坑体积测量)相同。SW暴露后,通过肾动脉灌注硫酸钡混悬液。在乳腺X线摄影胶片上测量代表血管损伤程度的皮质外渗最大直径(毫米)。进行苏木精-伊红染色。在所有三组(A、B、C)中,较高数量的SW导致外渗直径增加,在1000次冲击与20次冲击相比时具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。在施加相同数量的SW时,血管损伤不受焦点大小和正峰压的影响。焦点区域的组织学显示出间隙样缺陷。我们的离体数据表明,在相同的正峰压和破碎能力下,肾血管损伤与SW发生器的焦点直径无关。这证实了体内研究结果,即SW引起的肾损伤与所施加的SW数量有关。需要进行临床研究,以调查在一台SW机器中提供两种治疗模式是否有任何优势——例如,对肾结石使用“大焦点、低压”模式,对输尿管结石使用“小焦点、高压”模式。两种模式引起的肾损伤仍然相当。