Ishak K Jack, Platt Robert W, Joseph Lawrence, Hanley James A
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Que., Canada.
Stat Med. 2008 Feb 28;27(5):670-86. doi: 10.1002/sim.2913.
Multivariate meta-analyses are used to derive summary estimates of treatment effects for two or more outcomes from a joint model. In addition to treatment effects, these models also quantify the correlations between outcomes across studies. To be fully specified, the model requires an estimate of the covariance or correlations between outcomes observed in each study. These are rarely available in published reports, so that analysts must either approximate these or ignore correlations between effect estimates from the same studies. We examined the impact of errors in approximating within-study covariances on the parameters of multivariate models in a simulation study. We found that treatment effect and heterogeneity estimates were not strongly affected by inaccurate approximations, but estimates of the correlation between outcomes were sometimes highly biased. The potential for error is greatest when the covariance between outcomes within- and between-studies are of comparable scale.
多变量荟萃分析用于从联合模型中得出两个或更多结果的治疗效果汇总估计值。除治疗效果外,这些模型还对各研究中结果之间的相关性进行量化。为了完全确定,该模型需要估计每项研究中观察到的结果之间的协方差或相关性。这些在已发表的报告中很少能获取到,因此分析人员必须要么对其进行近似估计,要么忽略来自同一研究的效应估计值之间的相关性。我们在一项模拟研究中检验了在近似研究内协方差时的误差对多变量模型参数的影响。我们发现,治疗效果和异质性估计值并未受到不准确近似估计的强烈影响,但结果之间相关性的估计值有时存在高度偏差。当研究内和研究间结果的协方差规模相当时,出现误差的可能性最大。