• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非洲小农户玉米农场的肥料响应与氮素利用效率

Fertilizer response and nitrogen use efficiency in African smallholder maize farms.

作者信息

Ichami Stephen M, Shepherd Keith D, Sila Andrew M, Stoorvogel Jetse J, Hoffland Ellis

机构信息

Department of Land Resource Management and Agricultural Technology, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 29053 - 00625, Kabete, Nairobi, Kenya.

World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), United Nations Avenue, Gigiri, P.O. Box 30677 - 00100, Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2019;113(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10705-018-9958-y. Epub 2018 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1007/s10705-018-9958-y
PMID:32684797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7357725/
Abstract

Improving fertilizer recommendations for farmers is essential to increase food security in smallholder landscapes. Currently, blanket recommendations are provided across agro-ecological zones, although fertilizer response and nutrient use efficiency by maize crop are spatially variable. We aimed to identify factors that could help to refine fertilizer recommendation by analyzing the variability in fertilizer response (FR) and the agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (N-AE). A literature search for on-farm studies across Kenya and Sub-Sahara Africa (SSA), excluding Kenya, yielded 71 publications. The variability in FR was studied using a meta-analysis whereas key factors that influence FR and N-AE were studied with linear regression models. On average, the FR was 2, but it varied considerably from 1 to 28.5 (excluding outliers). In SSA, 18% of the plots were non-responsive plots with an FR < 1. The main factors affecting N-AE for Kenya were P-Olsen, silt content, soil pH, clay and rainfall, whereas only soil pH, exchangeable K and texture were important for SSA. However, our study indicates that available data on soil, climate and management factors could explain only a small part (< 33%) of the variation in FR and N-AE. Soil pH, P-Olsen, silt content, and rainfall had significant but low levels of power in explaining variation in FR and N-AE. Our findings indicate that strategies to refine fertilizer recommendation should include information on soil types and soil properties.

摘要

改进针对农民的肥料推荐对于提高小农户地区的粮食安全至关重要。目前,尽管玉米作物对肥料的反应和养分利用效率存在空间差异,但仍在各农业生态区提供统一的推荐。我们旨在通过分析肥料反应(FR)和农艺氮利用效率(N-AE)的变异性,确定有助于优化肥料推荐的因素。对肯尼亚和撒哈拉以南非洲(不包括肯尼亚)的田间研究进行文献检索,共获得71篇出版物。使用荟萃分析研究FR的变异性,而使用线性回归模型研究影响FR和N-AE的关键因素。平均而言,FR为2,但从1到28.5变化很大(不包括异常值)。在撒哈拉以南非洲,18%的地块是无反应地块,FR<1。影响肯尼亚N-AE的主要因素是 Olsen 磷、粉砂含量、土壤pH值、黏土和降雨量,而对于撒哈拉以南非洲,只有土壤pH值、交换性钾和质地是重要的。然而,我们的研究表明,关于土壤、气候和管理因素的现有数据只能解释FR和N-AE变异的一小部分(<33%)。土壤pH值、Olsen磷、粉砂含量和降雨量在解释FR和N-AE变异方面具有显著但较低的影响力。我们的研究结果表明,优化肥料推荐的策略应包括土壤类型和土壤性质的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b3a/7357725/34a7e2456f41/10705_2018_9958_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b3a/7357725/d17ed0654233/10705_2018_9958_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b3a/7357725/521e73a2eabc/10705_2018_9958_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b3a/7357725/5a5589a500b6/10705_2018_9958_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b3a/7357725/195c20752af1/10705_2018_9958_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b3a/7357725/34a7e2456f41/10705_2018_9958_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b3a/7357725/d17ed0654233/10705_2018_9958_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b3a/7357725/521e73a2eabc/10705_2018_9958_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b3a/7357725/5a5589a500b6/10705_2018_9958_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b3a/7357725/195c20752af1/10705_2018_9958_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b3a/7357725/34a7e2456f41/10705_2018_9958_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Fertilizer response and nitrogen use efficiency in African smallholder maize farms.非洲小农户玉米农场的肥料响应与氮素利用效率
Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2019;113(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10705-018-9958-y. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
2
Assessing and understanding non-responsiveness of maize and soybean to fertilizer applications in African smallholder farms.评估和理解非洲小农户农场中玉米和大豆对肥料施用的无反应情况。
Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2021 Jan 1;305:107165. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107165.
3
Science-based decision support for formulating crop fertilizer recommendations in sub-Saharan Africa.基于科学的决策支持,用于制定撒哈拉以南非洲地区的作物肥料推荐方案。
Agric Syst. 2020 Apr;180:102790. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102790.
4
Progress in research on site-specific nutrient management for smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲小农户特定地点养分管理的研究进展
Field Crops Res. 2022 May 15;281:108503. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108503.
5
Understanding variability in crop response to fertilizer and amendments in sub-Saharan Africa.了解撒哈拉以南非洲地区作物对肥料和改良剂反应的变异性。
Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2016 Aug 1;229:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.05.012.
6
Nitrogen fertilizer rate increases plant uptake and soil availability of essential nutrients in continuous maize production in Kenya and Zimbabwe.在肯尼亚和津巴布韦的连续玉米生产中,氮肥施用量增加了植物对必需养分的吸收以及土壤中必需养分的有效性。
Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2019;115(3):373-389. doi: 10.1007/s10705-019-10016-1. Epub 2019 Sep 7.
7
On-farm evaluation and determination of sources of variability of soybean response to inoculation and phosphorus fertilizer in northern Ghana.加纳北部大豆接种和磷肥反应变异性来源的农场评估与确定
Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2018 Nov 15;267:23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.08.007.
8
The effect of nitrogen-fertilizer and optimal plant population on the profitability of maize plots in the Wami River sub-basin, Tanzania: A bio-economic simulation approach.氮肥和最佳种植密度对坦桑尼亚瓦米河流域玉米田盈利能力的影响:一种生物经济模拟方法。
Agric Syst. 2020 Nov;185:102948. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102948. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
9
The role of active soil carbon in influencing the profitability of fertilizer use: Empirical evidence from smallholder maize plots in Tanzania.活性土壤碳对肥料使用效益的影响:来自坦桑尼亚小农户玉米田块的实证证据。
Land Degrad Dev. 2021 May 30;32(9):2681-2694. doi: 10.1002/ldr.3940. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
10
Modelling climate change impacts on maize yields under low nitrogen input conditions in sub-Saharan Africa.建立模型,研究在撒哈拉以南非洲地区低氮输入条件下,气候变化对玉米产量的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Oct;26(10):5942-5964. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15261. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Root-associated bacterial communities and root metabolite composition are linked to nitrogen use efficiency in sorghum.根相关细菌群落和根代谢产物组成与高粱的氮利用效率有关。
mSystems. 2024 Jan 23;9(1):e0119023. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01190-23. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
2
Regulatory Mechanisms of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria and Plant Nutrition against Abiotic Stresses in Brassicaceae Family.十字花科植物中促生根际细菌与植物营养抵御非生物胁迫的调控机制
Life (Basel). 2023 Jan 11;13(1):211. doi: 10.3390/life13010211.
3
Use of Organic Materials to Limit the Potential Negative Effect of Nitrogen on Maize in Different Soils.

本文引用的文献

1
Soil nutrient maps of Sub-Saharan Africa: assessment of soil nutrient content at 250 m spatial resolution using machine learning.撒哈拉以南非洲的土壤养分地图:使用机器学习以250米空间分辨率评估土壤养分含量
Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2017 Aug 2;109(1):77-102. doi: 10.1007/s10705-017-9870-x.
2
Understanding variability in crop response to fertilizer and amendments in sub-Saharan Africa.了解撒哈拉以南非洲地区作物对肥料和改良剂反应的变异性。
Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2016 Aug 1;229:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.05.012.
3
Mapping Soil Properties of Africa at 250 m Resolution: Random Forests Significantly Improve Current Predictions.
利用有机材料减轻不同土壤中氮对玉米的潜在负面影响
Materials (Basel). 2022 Aug 20;15(16):5755. doi: 10.3390/ma15165755.
4
Spatial approach for diagnosis of yield-limiting nutrients in smallholder agroecosystem landscape using population-based farm survey data.基于群体农场调查数据的小农农业生态系统景观中限制产量养分的空间诊断方法。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 2;17(2):e0262754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262754. eCollection 2022.
5
Agronomic and financial benefits of direct Minjingu phosphate rock use in acidic humic nitisols of Upper Eastern Kenya.在肯尼亚上东部酸性腐殖质泥质土中直接施用敏劲古磷矿粉的农艺效益和经济效益。
Heliyon. 2021 Nov 8;7(11):e08332. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08332. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
Assessing and understanding non-responsiveness of maize and soybean to fertilizer applications in African smallholder farms.评估和理解非洲小农户农场中玉米和大豆对肥料施用的无反应情况。
Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2021 Jan 1;305:107165. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107165.
7
Fertilizer profitability for smallholder maize farmers in Tanzania: A spatially-explicit ex ante analysis.坦桑尼亚小农玉米种植户的肥料盈利性:空间明确的事前分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 18;15(9):e0239149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239149. eCollection 2020.
以250米分辨率绘制非洲土壤属性图:随机森林显著改进当前预测结果。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 25;10(6):e0125814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125814. eCollection 2015.
4
Yield Trends Are Insufficient to Double Global Crop Production by 2050.单产趋势不足以在2050年前使全球作物产量翻番。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 19;8(6):e66428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066428. Print 2013.
5
Estimation of the predictive power of the model in mixed-effects meta-regression: A simulation study.混合效应元回归模型预测能力的估计:一项模拟研究。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2014 Feb;67(1):30-48. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12002. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
6
Impact of approximating or ignoring within-study covariances in multivariate meta-analyses.多变量荟萃分析中近似或忽略研究内协方差的影响。
Stat Med. 2008 Feb 28;27(5):670-86. doi: 10.1002/sim.2913.
7
Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?评估荟萃分析中的异质性:Q统计量还是I²指数?
Psychol Methods. 2006 Jun;11(2):193-206. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193.
8
Elevated CO2 stimulates net accumulations of carbon and nitrogen in land ecosystems: a meta-analysis.二氧化碳浓度升高刺激陆地生态系统中碳和氮的净积累:一项荟萃分析。
Ecology. 2006 Jan;87(1):53-63. doi: 10.1890/04-1724.
9
Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis.修剪与填充:一种基于漏斗图的简单方法,用于在荟萃分析中检测和校正发表偏倚。
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):455-63. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x.
10
Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences.荟萃分析中的发表偏倚:其原因与后果。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Feb;53(2):207-16. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00161-4.