Nissan Joseph, Parson Alex, Barnea Eitan, Shifman Arie, Assif David
Department of Prosthodontics, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Quintessence Int. 2007 Feb;38(2):e120-3.
The objective of this study was to assess the resistance to fracture of crowned endodontically treated premolars with varying ceramic and metal post systems under simulated occlusal load.
The study consisted of 60 extracted intact premolars with similar root diameter and length. Teeth were divided equally into 4 groups (n = 15) and prepared for posts and cast crowns as follows: group 1 = preformed metal post, composite core, and cast crown; group 2 = cast post and core and cast crown; group 3 = zirconia post, composite core, and cast crown; and group 4 = zirconia post and heat-pressed ceramic core and cast crown. All prepared teeth had 2 mm of sound dentin on which the cast crowns were cemented. A continuous load (kg) was applied by an Instron testing machine to the buccal cusp at a 30-degree angle to the long axis of each tooth at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min until failure. One-way analysis of variance with Scheffe test was used to statistically compare the differences between groups.
Mean failure loads (in newtons) for the 4 test groups were as follows: 1,103.3 (group 1), 1,234.5 (group 2), 826.6 (group 3), and 870.6 (group 4). No significant difference in failure load values was found among all tested groups (F[3,59] = 2.05; P >.05). The primary mode of failure (85%) in all groups was an oblique radicular fracture, either apical to the post or at the post level. Horizontal fracture (15% to 20%) of the root and post was found in groups 3 and 4.
Within the limitations of this study, varying ceramic and metal post systems did not affect the failure resistance of teeth restored with full-coverage cast metal crowns, under simulated occlusal load.
本研究的目的是评估在模拟咬合负载下,采用不同陶瓷和金属桩系统的根管治疗后带冠前磨牙的抗折性能。
本研究包括60颗完整拔除的前磨牙,其牙根直径和长度相似。将牙齿平均分为4组(n = 15),并按以下方式制备桩和铸造冠:第1组 = 预成金属桩、复合树脂核和铸造冠;第2组 = 铸造桩核和铸造冠;第3组 = 氧化锆桩、复合树脂核和铸造冠;第4组 = 氧化锆桩和热压铸陶瓷核及铸造冠。所有制备好的牙齿均保留2mm的健康牙本质,在其上粘结铸造冠。通过Instron测试机以2mm/min的十字头速度,在与每颗牙齿长轴成30度角的颊尖上施加连续负载(kg),直至牙齿折断。采用单因素方差分析和Scheffe检验对各组之间的差异进行统计学比较。
4个测试组的平均破坏载荷(以牛顿为单位)如下:1,103.3(第1组)、1,234.5(第组)、826.6(第3组)和870.6(第4组)。在所有测试组中,破坏载荷值没有显著差异(F[3,59] = 2.05;P >.05)。所有组的主要折断模式(8%)是斜行牙根折断,要么在桩尖下方,要么在桩的水平位置。第3组和第4组发现牙根和桩的水平折断(15%至20%)。
在本研究的局限性内,在模拟咬合负载下,不同的陶瓷和金属桩系统不会影响全冠铸造金属冠修复牙齿的抗折性能。