Suppr超能文献

探测量子效率评估:新引入的国际标准与先前方法的相互比较。

Assessment of detective quantum efficiency: intercomparison of a recently introduced international standard with prior methods.

作者信息

Ranger Nicole T, Samei Ehsan, Dobbins James T, Ravin Carl E

机构信息

Duke Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University and Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Rd, Suite 302, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 2007 Jun;243(3):785-95. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2433060485.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate the recently introduced international standard method for measurement of the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of digital radiography systems, in comparison with representative prior methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A recently introduced international standard method (International Electrotechnical Commission [IEC] 62220-1, 2003) for DQE measurement and two previously described DQE evaluation methods were considered. In addition to an overall comparison, evaluations of the following method factors were performed: beam quality, beam-limiting devices (apertures or collimators), noise power spectrum (NPS) analysis algorithms and parameters (area, region of interest size, background detrending), and modulation transfer function (MTF) test devices and methods.

RESULTS

Overall, at low to middle frequencies, the IEC method yielded DQE estimates that were 3.3% and 6.5% lower than the values yielded by the two previous methods. Averaged over the frequency range of 1.5-2.5 mm(-1), the DQE estimate derived by using the IEC method was 7.1% lower and 12.4% higher than the estimates derived by using the other two methods. Results obtained with the two previous DQE evaluation methods agreed well (within 2.0%) in the low- to middle-frequency range but diverged by up to 10% at higher frequencies. When the DQE method factors were evaluated separately, the largest percentage deviations in DQE were associated with (in order of decreasing influence) the MTF analysis method ( approximately 11%), the beam limitation (about 7%-10%), the beam quality ( approximately 9%), and the NPS analysis method ( approximately 3%).

CONCLUSION

Comparison of DQE estimates obtained by using the recently introduced international standard technique with those obtained by using prior methods revealed that the overall measurement method can affect the DQE estimate by as much as 12%. Findings further suggest that both beam limitation achieved by means of internal collimation (rather than external apertures) and use of a radio-opaque edge MTF device yield a more accurate estimation of the DQE.

摘要

目的

与代表性的先前方法相比,前瞻性地评估最近引入的用于测量数字射线摄影系统探测量子效率(DQE)的国际标准方法。

材料与方法

考虑了最近引入的用于DQE测量的国际标准方法(国际电工委员会[IEC]62220-1,2003)以及两种先前描述的DQE评估方法。除了进行总体比较外,还对以下方法因素进行了评估:射线质、射束限制装置(孔径或准直器)、噪声功率谱(NPS)分析算法和参数(面积、感兴趣区大小、背景去趋势)以及调制传递函数(MTF)测试装置和方法。

结果

总体而言,在低至中频时,IEC方法得出的DQE估计值比前两种方法得出的值分别低3.3%和6.5%。在1.5 - 2.5 mm⁻¹的频率范围内平均,使用IEC方法得出的DQE估计值比使用其他两种方法得出的估计值分别低7.1%和高12.4%。前两种DQE评估方法在低至中频范围内的结果吻合良好(在2.0%以内),但在高频时相差高达10%。当分别评估DQE方法因素时,DQE中最大的百分比偏差与(按影响程度递减顺序)MTF分析方法(约11%)、射束限制(约7% - 10%)、射线质(约9%)和NPS分析方法(约3%)相关。

结论

将最近引入的国际标准技术获得的DQE估计值与先前方法获得的估计值进行比较,结果表明总体测量方法对DQE估计值的影响可达12%。研究结果进一步表明,通过内部准直(而非外部孔径)实现的射束限制以及使用不透射线边缘MTF装置,能更准确地估计DQE。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31d3/2464291/13ca5c68f08d/nihms50511f1.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验