Suppr超能文献

衡量姑息治疗中随机前瞻性试验的结果。

Measuring outcomes in randomized prospective trials in palliative care.

作者信息

Mularski Richard A, Rosenfeld Kenneth, Coons Stephen Joel, Dueck Amylou, Cella David, Feuer David J, Lipscomb Joseph, Karpeh Martin S, Mosich Tom, Sloan Jeff A, Krouse Robert S

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97227, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Jul;34(1 Suppl):S7-S19. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.04.004. Epub 2007 May 25.

Abstract

Palliative care aims to improve the quality of life of patients and their families and reduce suffering from life-threatening illness. In assessing palliative care efficacy, researchers must consider a broad range of potential outcomes, including those experienced by the patient's family/caregivers, clinicians, and the health care system. The purpose of this article is to summarize the discussions and recommendations of an Outcomes Working Group convened to advance the palliative care research agenda, particularly in the context of randomized controlled trials. These recommendations address the conceptualization of palliative care outcomes, sources of outcomes data, application of outcome measures in clinical trials, and the methodological challenges to outcome measurement in palliative care populations. As other fields have developed and refined methodological approaches that address their particular research needs, palliative care researchers must do the same to answer important clinical questions in rigorous and credible ways.

摘要

姑息治疗旨在提高患者及其家属的生活质量,减轻危及生命疾病带来的痛苦。在评估姑息治疗效果时,研究人员必须考虑广泛的潜在结果,包括患者家属/护理人员、临床医生和医疗保健系统所经历的结果。本文的目的是总结一个成果工作组的讨论和建议,该工作组旨在推进姑息治疗研究议程,特别是在随机对照试验的背景下。这些建议涉及姑息治疗结果的概念化、结果数据的来源、结果测量在临床试验中的应用,以及姑息治疗人群结果测量的方法学挑战。随着其他领域开发并完善了满足其特定研究需求的方法学方法,姑息治疗研究人员也必须如此,以便以严谨可信的方式回答重要的临床问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验