Suppr超能文献

建设性思维与应对实验室诱发的压力。

Constructive thinking and coping with laboratory-induced stress.

作者信息

Katz L, Epstein S

机构信息

University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Nov;61(5):789-800. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.5.789.

Abstract

In a laboratory stress test, poor constructive thinkers produced more negative affective and cognitive responses in all experimental periods and a greater increase in such responses in the stress period than did good constructive thinkers. The groups differed in physiological arousal in the recovery period but not in the stress period. Stressor-instigated negative thoughts and spontaneous negative thoughts produced different patterns of relations with variables measured in the laboratory and with symptoms reported in everyday life. Discriminating patterns of relations were found between measures of cognition and affect in the laboratory and self-reported emotional, physical, and behavioral symptoms in everyday life. The results help explain the relation between maladaptive automatic thinking, on the one hand, and elevated physiological arousal and emotional, physical, and behavioral symptoms, on the other.

摘要

在一项实验室压力测试中,与善于建设性思考的人相比,不善于建设性思考的人在所有实验阶段都会产生更多消极的情感和认知反应,并且在压力阶段此类反应的增加幅度更大。两组在恢复期的生理唤醒水平存在差异,但在压力期没有差异。应激源引发的消极想法和自发产生的消极想法与实验室测量的变量以及日常生活中报告的症状呈现出不同的关系模式。在实验室中认知和情感测量指标与日常生活中自我报告的情绪、身体和行为症状之间发现了有区别的关系模式。这些结果有助于解释一方面适应不良的自动思维,与另一方面生理唤醒增强以及情绪、身体和行为症状之间的关系。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验