Kazembe Lawrence N
Malaria Research Programme, Medical Research Council, 491 Ridge Road, PO Box 70380, Overport 4067, Durban 4091, South Africa.
Acta Trop. 2007 May;102(2):126-37. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2007.04.012. Epub 2007 May 4.
Identifying areas of high risk is crucial for providing targeted antimalarial interventions. This study used ecological spatial regression models to profile spatial variation of malaria risk and analysed possible association of disease risk with environmental factors at sub-district level in northern Malawi. Using malaria incidence data collected between January 2002 and December 2003, we applied and compared Bayesian Poisson regression models assuming different spatial structures. For each model we adjusted for environmental covariates initially identified through bivariate non-spatial models. The model with both spatially structured and unstructured heterogeneity provided a better fit, guided by the model comparison criteria. Malaria incidence was associated with altitude, precipitation and soil water holding capacity. The risk increased with altitude (relative risk (RR): 1.092, 95% interval: 1.020, 1.169) and precipitation (RR: 1.031, 95% interval: 0.950, 1.120). At medium level of SWHC relative to low level, the risk was reduced (RR: 0.521, 95% interval: 0.298, 0.912), while at high level of SWHC relative to low level the risk was raised (RR: 1.649, 95% interval: 1.041, 2.612). Compared to the commonly used standardised incidence ratios, the model-based approach provided homogenous and easy to interpret risk estimates. Generally, the smoothed map showed less spatial variation in risk, with slightly higher estimates of malaria risk (RR>1) in low-lying areas mostly situated along the lakeshore regions, in particular in Karonga and Nkhatabay districts, and low risk (RR<1) in high-lying areas along Nyika plateau and Vwaza highlands. The results suggest that the spatial variation in malaria risk in the region is a combination of various environmental factors, both observed and unobserved, and the map only highlights the overall effect of these factors. The results also identified areas of increased risk, where further epidemiological investigations can be carried out. This study, therefore, constitutes an important first step and future models analysed at a sub-district level could be pursued to delineate priority areas for focussing of finite resources.
识别高风险区域对于提供有针对性的抗疟干预措施至关重要。本研究使用生态空间回归模型来描绘疟疾风险的空间变化,并分析了马拉维北部次区域层面疾病风险与环境因素之间可能存在的关联。利用2002年1月至2003年12月期间收集的疟疾发病率数据,我们应用并比较了假设不同空间结构的贝叶斯泊松回归模型。对于每个模型,我们对最初通过双变量非空间模型确定的环境协变量进行了调整。根据模型比较标准,具有空间结构化和非结构化异质性的模型拟合效果更好。疟疾发病率与海拔、降水量和土壤持水量有关。风险随海拔升高而增加(相对风险(RR):1.092,95%区间:1.020,1.169)以及降水量增加(RR:1.031,95%区间:0.950,1.120)。与低水平相比,中等水平的土壤持水量会降低风险(RR:0.521,95%区间:0.298,0.912),而与低水平相比,高水平的土壤持水量会提高风险(RR:1.649,95%区间:1.041,2.612)。与常用的标准化发病率相比,基于模型的方法提供了同质且易于解释的风险估计。总体而言,平滑后的地图显示风险的空间变化较小,在主要位于湖岸地区的低地地区,特别是在卡龙加和恩卡塔贝区,疟疾风险估计略高(RR>1),而在尼卡高原和瓦扎高地的高地地区风险较低(RR<1)。结果表明,该地区疟疾风险的空间变化是多种已观察到和未观察到的环境因素的综合结果,地图仅突出了这些因素的总体影响。结果还确定了风险增加的区域,可在这些区域开展进一步的流行病学调查。因此,本研究构成了重要的第一步,未来可以采用在次区域层面分析的模型来划定有限资源集中投入的优先区域。