• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知回避问卷:英文翻译的验证

The Cognitive Avoidance Questionnaire: validation of the English translation.

作者信息

Sexton Kathryn A, Dugas Michel J

机构信息

Concordia University, Department of Psychology, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, L-PY-170, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H4B 1R6.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2008;22(3):355-70. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.04.005. Epub 2007 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.04.005
PMID:17544253
Abstract

This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Cognitive Avoidance Questionnaire (CAQ; Gosselin, P., Langlois, F., Freeston, M. H., Ladouceur, R., Dugas, M. J., & Pelletier, O. (2002). Le Questionnaire d'évitement cognitif (QEC): Développement et validation auprès d'adultes et d'adolescents [The Cognitive Avoidance Questionnaire (CAQ): Development and validation among adult and adolescent samples]. Journal de Thérapie Comportementale et Cognitive, 12, 24-37) English translation. Questionnaires were administered to a sample of 456 (65.3% female; mean age=23.13 years, S.D.=5.18 years) undergraduate students at Concordia University in Montreal, Canada. The CAQ assesses five worry-related cognitive avoidance strategies, namely Thought Suppression, Thought Substitution, Distraction, Avoidance of Threatening Stimuli, and the Transformation of Images into Thoughts. The CAQ scale and subscales showed good to excellent internal consistency and good stability over a 5-week period. A confirmatory factor analysis found support for the proposed subscales, though the overall goodness-of-fit was lower than expected. Preliminary evidence of convergent and divergent validity was found with measures of worry, thought suppression, and dispositional coping styles. The relationship between the CAQ and specific dispositional coping styles, however, was dependent on the context of the situation in which the information-seeking and information-avoidant coping strategies were employed. Specifically, the CAQ was negatively correlated with vigilance in controllable situations and positively correlated with both information-avoidance in controllable situations and information-seeking in uncontrollable situations.

摘要

本研究调查了认知回避问卷(CAQ;戈斯林,P.,朗格卢瓦,F.,弗里斯顿,M. H.,拉杜塞尔,R.,迪加斯,M. J.,& 佩尔捷,O.(2002年)。《认知回避问卷》(QEC):在成年人和青少年中的编制与验证 [《认知回避问卷》(CAQ):在成年人和青少年样本中的编制与验证]。《行为与认知治疗杂志》,12,24 - 37)英文译本的心理测量特性。对加拿大蒙特利尔康考迪亚大学的456名本科生样本(65.3%为女性;平均年龄 = 23.13岁,标准差 = 5.18岁)进行了问卷调查。CAQ评估了五种与担忧相关的认知回避策略,即思维抑制、思维替代、分心、回避威胁性刺激以及将意象转化为思维。CAQ量表及其子量表显示出良好至优异的内部一致性,并且在5周期间具有良好的稳定性。验证性因素分析为所提议的子量表提供了支持,不过整体拟合优度低于预期。通过对担忧、思维抑制和特质应对方式的测量,发现了收敛效度和区分效度的初步证据。然而,CAQ与特定特质应对方式之间的关系取决于采用寻求信息和回避信息应对策略的情境背景。具体而言,CAQ在可控情境中与警惕性呈负相关,在可控情境中与信息回避呈正相关,在不可控情境中与寻求信息呈正相关。

相似文献

1
The Cognitive Avoidance Questionnaire: validation of the English translation.认知回避问卷:英文翻译的验证
J Anxiety Disord. 2008;22(3):355-70. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.04.005. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
2
[Evaluation of worry: validation of a French translation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire].[担忧评估:宾夕法尼亚州立大学担忧问卷法语翻译版的效度验证]
Encephale. 2001 Sep-Oct;27(5):475-84.
3
[Multidimensional assessment of coping: validation of the Brief COPE among French population].应对方式的多维评估:法国人群中简易应对方式问卷(Brief COPE)的效度验证
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):507-18.
4
[Study of psychometric properties of two new questionnaires assessing beliefs in hypochondriasis in a non-clinical population].[两项评估非临床人群疑病症信念的新问卷的心理测量特性研究]
Encephale. 2002 Jul-Aug;28(4):298-309.
5
Defining distinct negative beliefs about uncertainty: validating the factor structure of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale.定义对不确定性的不同负面信念:验证不确定性不耐受量表的因子结构。
Psychol Assess. 2009 Jun;21(2):176-86. doi: 10.1037/a0015827.
6
Current theoretical models of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD): conceptual review and treatment implications.广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)的当前理论模型:概念综述及治疗启示
J Anxiety Disord. 2009 Dec;23(8):1011-23. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
7
A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: properties of the MCQ-30.元认知问卷简版:MCQ - 30的特性
Behav Res Ther. 2004 Apr;42(4):385-96. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00147-5.
8
Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Cognitive Avoidance Questionnaire.荷兰认知回避问卷的心理测量特性。
Psychol Belg. 2020 Jul 2;60(1):184-197. doi: 10.5334/pb.522.
9
[Pain coping strategies: French adaptation of the coping strategies questionnaire (CSQ-F)].[疼痛应对策略:应对策略问卷的法语改编版(CSQ-F)]
Encephale. 2008 Jan;34(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2006.11.002. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
10
Psychometric validation of a monitoring-blunting measure for social anxiety disorder: the coping styles questionnaire for social situations (CSQSS).社交焦虑障碍监测钝化测量方法的心理测量学验证:社交情境应对方式问卷(CSQSS)
Depress Anxiety. 2005;22(1):20-7. doi: 10.1002/da.20081.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive appraisals, cognitive avoidance and rumination as shared vulnerabilities for PTSD and depression in trauma-exposed adolescents.认知评估、认知回避和反复思考是遭受创伤的青少年患创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症的共同易感性因素。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2527550. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2527550. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
2
A Mobile Ecological Momentary Intervention for Reducing Experiential Avoidance in the Context of Rumination: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.一种用于减少反刍情境下经验性回避的移动生态瞬时干预:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 27;14:e66067. doi: 10.2196/66067.
3
Randomised clinical trial investigating memory training for recovery-adolescents in addressing psychiatric concerns among adolescents in Iraq.
一项随机临床试验,研究针对伊拉克青少年康复期青少年的记忆训练对解决青少年精神问题的作用。
J Glob Health. 2025 May 5;15:04111. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04111.
4
Cognitive Aspects of Generalised Anxiety Disorder in Adolescents: Exploring Intolerance of Uncertainty, Cognitive Avoidance, and Positive Beliefs About Worry.青少年广泛性焦虑症的认知方面:探究对不确定性的不耐受、认知回避以及对担忧的积极信念。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 Feb 25. doi: 10.1007/s10578-025-01809-3.
5
It is Time to Address Fear of Cancer Recurrence in Family Caregivers: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Randomized Pilot Study of the Family Caregiver Version of the Fear of Recurrence Therapy (FC-FORT).是时候关注家庭照顾者对癌症复发的恐惧了:针对家庭照顾者版本的复发恐惧疗法(FC-FORT)的随机试点研究的可行性和可接受性。
Psychooncology. 2025 Feb;34(2):e70084. doi: 10.1002/pon.70084.
6
It is time to address fear of cancer recurrence in family caregivers: protocol for the feasibility and acceptability of a randomized pilot study of the online version of the Family Caregiver-Fear Of Recurrence Therapy (FC-FORT).是时候关注家庭护理人员对癌症复发的恐惧了:一项关于在线版家庭护理人员-复发恐惧疗法(FC-FORT)随机试点研究的可行性和可接受性的方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Nov 19;10(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01567-4.
7
Dysfunctional Metacognitive Beliefs, Experiential Avoidance,and Behavioral Inhibition System in Depressive Disorder.抑郁症中的功能失调性元认知信念、经验性回避和行为抑制系统。
Alpha Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 1;24(4):167-173. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2023.231144. eCollection 2023 Jul.
8
Applicability of the cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder to adolescents' sleep quality: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis.广泛性焦虑症认知模型对青少年睡眠质量的适用性:一项横断面和纵向分析。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2023 Oct-Dec;23(4):100406. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100406. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
9
The rise and fall of job insecurity during a pandemic: The role of habitual coping.疫情期间工作不安全感的起伏:习惯性应对方式的作用。
J Vocat Behav. 2022 Dec;139:103792. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103792. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
10
Using machine learning to identify important predictors of COVID-19 infection prevention behaviors during the early phase of the pandemic.利用机器学习识别大流行早期阶段新冠病毒感染预防行为的重要预测因素。
Patterns (N Y). 2022 Apr 8;3(4):100482. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100482. Epub 2022 Mar 9.