• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解释急性阑尾炎患者手术治疗中与保险相关的差异和种族差异。

Explaining insurance-related and racial disparities in the surgical management of patients with acute appendicitis.

作者信息

Pieracci Fredric M, Eachempati Soumitra R, Christos Paul J, Barie Philip S, Mushlin Alvin I

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 411 East 69th St., No. KB-220, New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2007 Jul;194(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.11.024.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.11.024
PMID:17560910
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Race and insurance status influence the likelihood of undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) versus open appendectomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis. We hypothesized that these disparities are caused by presenting hospitals' use of LA.

METHODS

The analysis included 26,104 appendectomies for acute appendicitis in New York State during 2003 and 2004. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors for undergoing LA versus open appendectomy.

RESULTS

Before adjustment for individual hospital use of LA, both white patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-1.36; P < .0001] and privately insured patients (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.44-1.61; P < .0001) were more likely to undergo LA. Controlling for differential hospitals' use of LA decreased the OR for laparoscopic surgery to 1.08 (95% CI 1.01-1.15; P = .04) for white patients and to 1.22 (95% CI 1.15-1.31; P < .0001) for privately insured patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in presenting hospitals' use of LA maintain racial and, to a lesser extent, insurance-related disparities in the surgical management of patients with acute appendicitis.

摘要

背景

种族和保险状况会影响因急性阑尾炎接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)而非开腹阑尾切除术的可能性。我们推测这些差异是由就诊医院对LA的使用情况导致的。

方法

该分析纳入了2003年至2004年纽约州26,104例急性阑尾炎阑尾切除术。采用多因素逻辑回归确定接受LA与开腹阑尾切除术的独立预测因素。

结果

在对各医院LA使用情况进行调整之前,白人患者(优势比[OR]=1.28,95%置信区间[CI]1.21 - 1.36;P<.0001)和私人保险患者(OR = 1.52,95% CI 1.44 - 1.61;P<.0001)接受LA的可能性更高。控制不同医院对LA的使用情况后,白人患者接受腹腔镜手术的OR降至1.08(95% CI 1.01 - 1.15;P = .04),私人保险患者的OR降至1.22(95% CI 1.15 - 1.31;P<.0001)。

结论

就诊医院对LA使用情况的差异在急性阑尾炎患者手术治疗中维持了种族差异,并在较小程度上维持了与保险相关的差异。

相似文献

1
Explaining insurance-related and racial disparities in the surgical management of patients with acute appendicitis.解释急性阑尾炎患者手术治疗中与保险相关的差异和种族差异。
Am J Surg. 2007 Jul;194(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.11.024.
2
Insurance status and race represent independent predictors of undergoing laparoscopic surgery for appendicitis: secondary data analysis of 145,546 patients.保险状况和种族是阑尾炎患者接受腹腔镜手术的独立预测因素:对145,546例患者的二次数据分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Oct;199(4):567-75; discussion 575-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.06.023.
3
Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals.222 家 ACS NSQIP 医院中腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的结局比较。
Surgery. 2010 Oct;148(4):625-35; discussion 635-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.025. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
4
Laparoscopic appendectomy--is it worth the cost? Trend analysis in the US from 2000 to 2005.腹腔镜阑尾切除术——是否物有所值?2000年至2005年美国的趋势分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Feb;208(2):179-85.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.026.
5
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
6
Insurance status, but not race, predicts perforation in adult patients with acute appendicitis.保险状况而非种族可预测成年急性阑尾炎患者的穿孔情况。
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Sep;205(3):445-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.04.010. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
7
Effectiveness of laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis.腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效
Osaka City Med J. 2007 Jun;53(1):1-8.
8
Factors affecting innovation in pediatric surgery: hospital type and appendectomies.影响小儿外科创新的因素:医院类型与阑尾切除术
J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Nov;41(11):1809-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.06.006.
9
Comparison between open and laparoscopic appendectomy in non-complicated appendicitis.非复杂性阑尾炎的开腹阑尾切除术与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较。
Bol Asoc Med P R. 2008 Jan-Mar;100(1):20-5.
10
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in West Bengal, India.印度西孟加拉邦的腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术对比
Chin J Dig Dis. 2005;6(4):165-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-9573.2005.00225.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Referrals.复杂腹壁重建转诊中的种族和社会经济差异
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024 May 30;3:12946. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.12946. eCollection 2024.
2
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.微创手术治疗结直肠癌时代的种族/民族差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(11):6748-6759. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13693-z. Epub 2023 Jul 9.
3
Who Gets Early Tracheostomy?: Evidence of Unequal Treatment at 185 Academic Medical Centers.
谁接受早期气管切开术?185家学术医疗中心存在不平等治疗的证据。
Chest. 2015 Nov;148(5):1242-1250. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-0576.
4
Laparoscopic appendectomy performed by residents and experienced surgeons.由住院医师和经验丰富的外科医生进行的腹腔镜阑尾切除术。
JSLS. 2009 Jul-Sep;13(3):391-7.
5
Hospital volume as a surrogate for laparoscopically assisted colectomy.以医院手术量作为腹腔镜辅助结肠切除术的替代指标。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Mar;24(3):662-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0665-2. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
6
Disparities in the provision of medical care: an outcome in search of an explanation.医疗服务提供方面的差异:一个寻求解释的结果。
J Behav Med. 2009 Feb;32(1):48-63. doi: 10.1007/s10865-008-9192-1. Epub 2009 Jan 6.