Nguyen Nam P, Vos Paul, Karlsson Ulf, Nguyen Phuc, Dutta Suresh, Lemanski Claire, Ludin Adir, Rose Sue, Nguyen Ly M, Ward Harold, Huang Shawn, Sallah Sabah
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2007;69(5):271-6. doi: 10.1159/000103870. Epub 2007 Jun 12.
To evaluate the impact of chemoradiation and postoperative radiation on patients' quality of life (QOL) in a single institution.
A retrospective analysis of 101 patients who had treatment for locally advanced head and neck cancer in a single institution. Forty-seven patients had chemotherapy and radiation, 54 patients underwent postoperative radiation. QOL was assessed with the University of Washington (UW), and the Hospital Anxiety (HA) and Depression (HD) questionnaires. All patients were free of disease at the survey time.
Mean and median UW scores were not different between the 2 groups: chemoradiation (65/67), postoperative radiation (62/63). Mean and median HA scores were 7.6/7 (chemoradiation), and 8.3/8 (postoperative radiation). Mean and median HD scores were 6.7/7 (chemoradiation), and 7.1/7 (postoperative radiation). Forty-four patients developed complications, with mean/median UW, HA, and HD scores of 55/55, 9.9/8, and 8.9/9, respectively. These scores were significantly different compared to the 57 patients without complications: 70/70 (p = 0.0001), 6.5/6 (p = 0.001), and 8.9/9 (p = 0.0001).
There was no significant difference in QOL between chemoradiation and postoperative radiation in this retrospective study with a relatively short follow-up in the chemoradiation group. In addition, there were more patients with resectable disease in the postoperative group which may explain the lack of difference in QOL between the two groups. Patients who developed complications following treatment experienced lower QOL, more anxiety and depression. Our study raised the need to conduct a prospective randomized study to assess the real impact of chemoradiation and postoperative radiation on patients' QOL.
在单一机构中评估放化疗及术后放疗对患者生活质量(QOL)的影响。
对在单一机构接受局部晚期头颈癌治疗的101例患者进行回顾性分析。47例患者接受了化疗和放疗,54例患者接受了术后放疗。使用华盛顿大学(UW)问卷以及医院焦虑(HA)和抑郁(HD)问卷对生活质量进行评估。在调查时所有患者均无疾病。
两组间UW评分的均值和中位数无差异:放化疗组(65/67),术后放疗组(62/63)。HA评分的均值和中位数分别为7.6/7(放化疗组)和8.3/8(术后放疗组)。HD评分的均值和中位数分别为6.7/7(放化疗组)和7.1/7(术后放疗组)。44例患者出现并发症,UW、HA和HD评分的均值/中位数分别为55/55、9.9/8和8.9/9。与57例无并发症的患者相比,这些评分有显著差异:70/70(p = 0.0001),6.5/6(p = 0.001),8.9/9(p = 0.0001)。
在这项回顾性研究中,放化疗组随访时间相对较短,放化疗与术后放疗在生活质量方面无显著差异。此外,术后组中可切除疾病的患者更多,这可能解释了两组在生活质量上缺乏差异的原因。治疗后出现并发症的患者生活质量较低,焦虑和抑郁情绪更严重。我们的研究提出有必要进行一项前瞻性随机研究,以评估放化疗和术后放疗对患者生活质量的实际影响。