Suppr超能文献

知识匮乏——巴基斯坦一级护理机构中不遵守血源性病原体通用防护措施的预测因素。

Poor knowledge--predictor of nonadherence to universal precautions for blood borne pathogens at first level care facilities in Pakistan.

作者信息

Janjua Naveed Z, Razaq Mahreen, Chandir Subhash, Rozi Shafquat, Mahmood Bushra

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2007 Jul 24;7:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-7-81.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We conducted an assessment of knowledge about blood borne pathogens (BBP) and use of universal precautions at first level care facilities (FLCF) in two districts of Pakistan.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey and selected three different types of FLCFs ; public, general practitioners and unqualified practitioners through stratified random sampling technique. At each facility, we interviewed a prescriber, a dispenser, and a housekeeper for knowledge of BBPs transmission and preventive practices, risk perception, and use of universal precautions. We performed multiple linear regression to assess the effect of knowledge score (11 items) on the practice of universal precautions score (4 items- use of gloves, gown, needle recapping, and HBV vaccination).

RESULTS

We interviewed 239 subjects. Most of the participants 128 (53%) were recruited from general practitioners clinics and 166 (69.5%) of them were dispensers. Mean (SD) knowledge score was 3.8 (2.3) with median of 4. MBBS prescribers had the highest knowledge score while the housekeepers had the lowest. Mean universal precautions use score was 2.7 +/- 2.1. Knowledge about mode of transmission and the work experience alone, significantly predicted universal precaution use in multiple linear regression model (adR2 = 0.093).

CONCLUSION

Knowledge about mode of transmission of blood borne pathogens is very low. Use of universal precautions can improve with increase in knowledge.

摘要

背景

我们对巴基斯坦两个地区一级护理机构(FLCF)关于血源性病原体(BBP)的知识及通用防护措施的使用情况进行了评估。

方法

我们开展了一项横断面调查,通过分层随机抽样技术选取了三种不同类型的一级护理机构;公立机构、全科医生诊所和不合格从业者诊所。在每个机构,我们采访了一名开处方者、一名药剂师和一名勤杂工,了解他们对血源性病原体传播及预防措施、风险认知和通用防护措施使用情况的了解。我们进行了多元线性回归分析,以评估知识得分(11项)对通用防护措施得分(4项——手套使用、防护服穿着、针头回套和乙肝疫苗接种)的影响。

结果

我们采访了239名受试者。大多数参与者128名(53%)来自全科医生诊所,其中166名(69.5%)是药剂师。平均(标准差)知识得分为3.8(2.3),中位数为4。医学学士开处方者的知识得分最高,而勤杂工的得分最低。通用防护措施使用平均得分为2.7±2.1。在多元线性回归模型中,仅关于传播方式的知识和工作经验显著预测了通用防护措施的使用(调整R² = 0.093)。

结论

关于血源性病原体传播方式的知识非常匮乏。随着知识的增加,通用防护措施的使用情况可能会得到改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/187d/1945028/cea462f25f3c/1471-2334-7-81-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验