Vallely Andrew, Shagi Charles, Kasindi Stella, Desmond Nicola, Lees Shelley, Chiduo Betty, Hayes Richard, Allen Caroline, Ross David
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2007 Jul 2;7:133. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-133.
As part of a microbicide trial feasibility study among women at high-risk of HIV and sexually transmitted infections in Mwanza City, northern Tanzania we used participatory research tools to facilitate open dialogue and partnership between researchers and study participants.
A mobile community-based sexual & reproductive health service was established in ten city wards. Wards were divided into seventy-eight geographical clusters and representatives at cluster and ward level elected in a process facilitated by the projects Community Liaison Officer. A city-level Community Advisory Committee (CAC) with representatives from each ward was established. Workshops and community meetings at ward and city-level were conducted to explore project-related concerns using tools adapted from participatory learning and action techniques such as listing, scoring, ranking, chapatti diagrams and pair-wise matrices.
Key issues identified included beliefs that blood specimens were being sold for witchcraft purposes; worries about specula not being clean; inadequacy of transport allowances; and delays in reporting laboratory test results to participants. To date, the project has responded by inviting members of the CAC to visit the laboratory to observe how blood and genital specimens are prepared; demonstrated the use of the autoclave to community representatives; raised reimbursement levels; introduced HIV rapid testing in the clinic; and streamlined laboratory reporting procedures.
Participatory techniques were instrumental in promoting meaningful dialogue between the research team, study participants and community representatives in Mwanza, allowing researchers and community representatives to gain a shared understanding of project-related priority areas for intervention.
作为在坦桑尼亚北部姆万扎市开展的一项针对艾滋病毒和性传播感染高危女性的杀微生物剂试验可行性研究的一部分,我们使用了参与式研究工具,以促进研究人员与研究参与者之间的开放对话和伙伴关系。
在该市的十个城区设立了一个基于社区的流动性与生殖健康服务机构。这些城区被划分为78个地理集群,并在该项目社区联络官的协助下选出了集群和城区层面的代表。成立了一个由每个城区代表组成的市级社区咨询委员会(CAC)。利用从参与式学习与行动技术改编而来的工具,如列表、评分、排序、薄饼图和成对矩阵,在城区和市级层面举办了研讨会和社区会议,以探讨与项目相关的问题。
确定的关键问题包括:认为血样被用于巫术目的;担心窥器不干净;交通补贴不足;以及向参与者报告实验室检测结果存在延迟。迄今为止,该项目已做出回应,邀请CAC成员参观实验室,观察血液和生殖器样本的制备过程;向社区代表演示高压灭菌器的使用;提高报销水平;在诊所引入艾滋病毒快速检测;并简化实验室报告程序。
参与式技术有助于促进姆万扎的研究团队、研究参与者和社区代表之间进行有意义的对话,使研究人员和社区代表能够对与项目相关的优先干预领域达成共同理解。