Heikkilä Katriina, Ebrahim Shah, Lawlor Debbie A
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol, UK.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Sep;61(9):824-33. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.051292.
The objective of this study was to review and summarise the published evidence for an association between circulating concentrations of C reactive protein (CRP) and cancer through a systematic review. 90 discrete studies were identified. 81 (90%) were prevalent case-control or cross-sectional studies, and only 9 studies had a prospective design. In most prevalent studies, CRP concentrations were found to be higher in patients with cancer than in healthy controls or controls with benign conditions. Of the nine large prospective studies identified in this review, four reported no relationship between circulating CRP levels and breast, prostate or colorectal cancers, and five studies found that CRP was associated with colorectal or lung cancers. Most of the studies evaluating CRP as a diagnostic marker of cancer did not present relevant statistical analyses. Furthermore, any association reported in the prevalent studies might reflect reverse causation, survival bias or confounding. The prospective studies provided no strong evidence for a causal role of CRP in cancer. Instead of further prevalent studies, more large prospective studies and CRP gene-cancer association studies would be valuable in investigating the role of CRP in cancer.
本研究的目的是通过系统评价,回顾和总结已发表的关于循环中C反应蛋白(CRP)浓度与癌症之间关联的证据。共识别出90项独立研究。其中81项(90%)为现患病例对照研究或横断面研究,仅有9项研究采用前瞻性设计。在大多数现患研究中,发现癌症患者的CRP浓度高于健康对照或患有良性疾病的对照。在本评价中识别出的9项大型前瞻性研究中,4项报告循环CRP水平与乳腺癌、前列腺癌或结直肠癌之间无关联,5项研究发现CRP与结直肠癌或肺癌有关。大多数将CRP作为癌症诊断标志物的研究未进行相关统计分析。此外,现患研究中报告的任何关联可能反映了反向因果关系、生存偏倚或混杂因素。前瞻性研究未提供有力证据证明CRP在癌症中具有因果作用。与其开展更多现患研究,更多大型前瞻性研究和CRP基因-癌症关联研究对于调查CRP在癌症中的作用将更有价值。