Clabots C R, Bettin K M, Peterson L R, Gerding D N
Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Nov;29(11):2633-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.11.2633-2635.1991.
Cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA) and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose broth (CCFB) containing either 500 or 250 micrograms of cycloserine per ml were compared for efficacy in the isolation of Clostridium difficile from hospital ward environmental sites. A RODAC imprint technique was used to inoculate prereduced CCFA. Moistened swabs were used to inoculate prereduced CCFB from environmental sites immediately adjacent to the RODAC sample sites. CCFA (6% positive) was significantly more sensitive than CCFB (3% positive; P less than 0.005), regardless of the cycloserine concentration. When the CCFA cycloserine concentration was decreased from 500 to 250 micrograms/ml, the overall rate of positive cultures rose from 4 to 17%. Medium containing 500 micrograms of cycloserine per ml may be too inhibitory to isolate many moderately sensitive strains of C. difficile from environmental sites. Regardless of the cycloserine concentration, the CCFA RODAC imprint technique is superior to the CCFB method.
比较了每毫升含500微克或250微克环丝氨酸的环丝氨酸-头孢西丁-果糖琼脂(CCFA)和环丝氨酸-头孢西丁-果糖肉汤(CCFB)从医院病房环境部位分离艰难梭菌的效果。采用RODAC平板印迹技术接种预先还原的CCFA。使用湿润的拭子从紧邻RODAC样本部位的环境部位接种预先还原的CCFB。无论环丝氨酸浓度如何,CCFA(阳性率6%)比CCFB(阳性率3%;P<0.005)敏感性显著更高。当CCFA中环丝氨酸浓度从500微克/毫升降至250微克/毫升时,阳性培养物的总体比例从4%升至17%。每毫升含500微克环丝氨酸的培养基可能对从环境部位分离许多中度敏感的艰难梭菌菌株抑制作用过大。无论环丝氨酸浓度如何,CCFA的RODAC平板印迹技术优于CCFB方法。