Gill M J, Harris S L
Rutgers, State University of New Jersey, Piscataway 08854-0819.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1991 Dec;21(4):407-16. doi: 10.1007/BF02206867.
Mothers of 60 children with autism participated in this study to measure the effects of social support and hardiness on the women's responses to the stressful demands of raising a child with a disability. MANOVA analysis indicated a significant main effect for hardiness, Wilks' lambda = .859, approx. F(2, 55) = 4.494, p less than .02. There were no main effects for social support, or for the interaction of social support and hardiness. In regression analyses, the best combination of predictors of depressive symptoms were the Commitment dimension on the Hardiness Questionnaire and the total score on the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List social support inventory, mult. R = .783, p less than .001. The best predictor of somatic complaints was total Hardiness score, mult. R = .698, p less than .01. There was a significant correlation between hardiness and perceived social support, r(57) = -.67, p less than .001. Results are discussed in terms of the relationship between perceived social support and hardiness and the potential buffering effect of these dimensions.
60名自闭症儿童的母亲参与了本研究,以衡量社会支持和心理韧性对这些女性应对抚养残疾儿童压力需求的影响。多变量方差分析表明心理韧性存在显著主效应,威尔克斯Lambda值 = 0.859,近似F(2, 55) = 4.494,p < 0.02。社会支持不存在主效应,社会支持与心理韧性的交互作用也不存在主效应。在回归分析中,抑郁症状预测指标的最佳组合是心理韧性问卷中的奉献维度以及人际支持评估量表社会支持量表的总分,复相关系数R = 0.783,p < 0.001。躯体不适的最佳预测指标是心理韧性总分,复相关系数R = 0.698,p < 0.01。心理韧性与感知到的社会支持之间存在显著相关性,r(57) = -0.67,p < 0.001。研究结果从感知到的社会支持与心理韧性之间的关系以及这些维度的潜在缓冲作用方面进行了讨论。