• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国一项基于社会认知理论的戒烟群体干预随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial of group intervention based on social cognitive theory for smoking cessation in China.

作者信息

Zheng Pinpin, Guo Fengxia, Chen Yue, Fu Yingying, Ye Tingting, Fu Hua

机构信息

School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;17(5):147-55. doi: 10.2188/jea.17.147.

DOI:10.2188/jea.17.147
PMID:17827861
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7058478/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

New training programs need to be developed to help Chinese smokers achieve quitting. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a group smoking cessation intervention based on social cognitive theory among Chinese smokers.

METHOD

A total of 225 smokers were eligible for the study and were randomly assigned to an intervention group (n=118) and a control group (n=107). The intervention group received the course soon after a baseline survey, whereas the control group received routine training in the first 6 months, and then took the same course. Effectiveness was evaluated at 6-month and 1-year follow-up from baseline.

RESULTS

After 6 months, 40.5% (47/116) in the intervention group and 5.0% (5/101) in the control group quit smoking (absolute risk reduction: 35.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 24.2-46.8%]). The 6-month continuous abstinence rate was 28.4% (33/116) in the intervention group and 3.0% (3/101) in the control group (absolute risk reduction 25.4% [95% CI: 15.6-35.2%]). At 1-year follow-up, the proportion of quitting and the 6-month abstinence rate in the intervention group were 35.8% and 22.0%, respectively. The factors associated with smoking cessation during the 6 month period were intervention (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=6.42 [95% CI: 2.46-13.28]), as well as anticipation of quitting (adjusted OR=1.46 [95% CI: 1.12-1.91]) and skill self-efficacy score in the baseline (adjusted OR=1.04 [95% CI: 1.01-1.07]). The same intervention was conducted in the control group after the 6-month study, in which a similar intervention effect was observed.

CONCLUSION

A smoking cessation intervention based on social cognitive theory among Chinese smokers is highly effective.

摘要

背景

需要开发新的培训项目来帮助中国吸烟者戒烟。本研究的目的是评估基于社会认知理论的团体戒烟干预对中国吸烟者的有效性。

方法

共有225名吸烟者符合研究条件,被随机分为干预组(n = 118)和对照组(n = 107)。干预组在基线调查后不久接受课程,而对照组在前6个月接受常规培训,然后参加相同的课程。从基线开始在6个月和1年随访时评估有效性。

结果

6个月后,干预组40.5%(47/116)的吸烟者戒烟,对照组为5.0%(5/101)(绝对风险降低:35.5%[95%置信区间(CI):24.2 - 46.8%])。干预组6个月持续戒烟率为28.4%(33/116),对照组为3.0%(3/101)(绝对风险降低25.4%[95%CI:15.6 - 35.2%])。在1年随访时,干预组的戒烟比例和6个月戒烟率分别为35.8%和22.0%。6个月期间与戒烟相关的因素是干预(调整后的优势比[OR]=6.42[95%CI:2.46 - 13.28]),以及戒烟预期(调整后的OR = 1.46[95%CI:1.12 - 1.91])和基线时的技能自我效能得分(调整后的OR = 1.04[95%CI:1.01 - 1.07])。6个月研究结束后,对照组进行了相同的干预,观察到了类似的干预效果。

结论

基于社会认知理论的戒烟干预对中国吸烟者非常有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55cf/7058478/e1ff13ed852b/je-17-147-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55cf/7058478/e1ff13ed852b/je-17-147-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55cf/7058478/e1ff13ed852b/je-17-147-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A randomized controlled trial of group intervention based on social cognitive theory for smoking cessation in China.中国一项基于社会认知理论的戒烟群体干预随机对照试验。
J Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;17(5):147-55. doi: 10.2188/jea.17.147.
2
[Evaluation of two-year follow-up of group intervention on smoking cessation based on social cognitive theory].
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2008 Jan;37(1):53-6.
3
A Proactive Smoking Cessation Intervention for Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Smokers: The Role of Smoking-Related Stigma.一项针对社会经济地位不利的吸烟者的主动戒烟干预措施:与吸烟相关的污名的作用。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Feb 7;20(3):286-294. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx085.
4
Smoking cessation intervention in parents of young children: a randomised controlled trial.针对幼儿父母的戒烟干预:一项随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2005 Nov;100(11):1731-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01231.x.
5
Very brief physician advice and supplemental proactive telephone calls to promote smoking reduction and cessation in Chinese male smokers with no intention to quit: a randomized trial.非常简短的医生建议和补充性主动电话,以促进有意愿戒烟的中国男性吸烟者减少和戒烟:一项随机试验。
Addiction. 2017 Nov;112(11):2032-2040. doi: 10.1111/add.13908. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
6
Twelve-Month Outcomes of a Group-Randomized Community Health Advocate-Led Smoking Cessation Intervention in Public Housing.社区健康倡导员主导的戒烟干预措施:一项为期 12 个月的群组随机对照试验结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Nov 15;20(12):1434-1441. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx193.
7
Comparing the efficacy of two Internet-based, computer-tailored smoking cessation programs: a randomized trial.比较两种基于互联网的、计算机定制的戒烟方案的疗效:一项随机试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar 8;7(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e2.
8
Understanding how a smoking cessation intervention changes beliefs, self-efficacy, and intention to quit: a secondary analysis of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.了解戒烟干预如何改变信念、自我效能感和戒烟意愿:一项实用随机对照试验的二次分析。
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Jan 1;9(1):58-66. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx070.
9
Effectiveness of a small cash incentive on abstinence and use of cessation aids for adult smokers: A randomized controlled trial.小额现金激励对成年吸烟者戒烟及使用戒烟辅助工具的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Addict Behav. 2017 Mar;66:17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
10
Effect of a workplace-based group training programme combined with financial incentives on smoking cessation: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.基于工作场所的团体培训计划结合经济激励对戒烟效果的影响:一项集群随机对照试验。
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Nov;3(11):e536-e544. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30185-3. Epub 2018 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in the effectiveness of individual-level smoking cessation interventions by socioeconomic status.个体层面戒烟干预措施的有效性在社会经济地位方面的差异。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 27;1(1):CD015120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015120.pub2.
2
How Social Influence Promotes the Adoption of Mobile Health among Young Adults in China: A Systematic Analysis of Trust, Health Consciousness, and User Experience.社会影响如何促进中国年轻人对移动健康的采用:对信任、健康意识和用户体验的系统分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jun 14;14(6):498. doi: 10.3390/bs14060498.
3
What Are the Effective Components of Group-Based Treatment Programs For Smoking Cessation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Smoking cessation 2: behavioral treatments.戒烟2:行为疗法
Behav Med. 2006 Fall;32(3):99-109. doi: 10.3200/BMED.32.3.99-109.
2
A brief smoking cessation intervention for Chinese and Korean American smokers.针对华裔和韩裔美国吸烟者的简短戒烟干预措施。
Prev Med. 2006 Oct;43(4):321-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.06.009. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
3
High cessation rates of cigarette smoking in subjects with and without COPD.患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和未患COPD的受试者中,吸烟戒断率较高。
基于团体的戒烟治疗方案的有效成分是什么?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Aug 19;25(9):1525-1537. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad068.
4
Knowledge, attitude, and beliefs toward group behavior therapy programs among male adults attending smoking cessation clinics, cross-sectional analysis.对参加戒烟诊所的成年男性群体行为治疗项目的认知、态度和信念,横断面分析
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 5;21(1):868. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10924-4.
5
The efficacy of smoking cessation interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在中低收入国家中,戒烟干预措施的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Addiction. 2019 Apr;114(4):620-635. doi: 10.1111/add.14518. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
6
Predicting the Time Spent Playing Computer and Mobile Games among Medical Undergraduate Students Using Interpersonal Relations and Social Cognitive Theory: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Chongqing, China.运用人际关系理论和社会认知理论预测医学生玩电脑游戏和手机游戏的时间:一项在中国重庆进行的横断面调查
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 6;15(8):1664. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081664.
7
Predicting Physical Activity and Healthy Nutrition Behaviors Using Social Cognitive Theory: Cross-Sectional Survey among Undergraduate Students in Chongqing, China.运用社会认知理论预测身体活动和健康营养行为:中国重庆大学生的横断面调查
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 5;14(11):1346. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111346.
8
Group behaviour therapy programmes for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的团体行为治疗方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 31;3(3):CD001007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001007.pub3.
9
Applying Psychological Theories to Promote Long-Term Maintenance of Health Behaviors.应用心理学理论促进健康行为的长期维持。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2016 Nov;10(6):356-368. doi: 10.1177/1559827614554594. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
10
Text to Quit China: An mHealth Smoking Cessation Trial.“告别中国”文本:一项移动健康戒烟试验。
Am J Health Promot. 2017 May;31(3):217-225. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.140812-QUAN-399. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
Chest. 2005 Nov;128(5):3685-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.5.3685.
4
Effectiveness of hospital-based smoking cessation.基于医院的戒烟效果。
Chest. 2005 Jul;128(1):216-23. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.1.216.
5
Outcome criteria in smoking cessation trials: proposal for a common standard.戒烟试验的结果标准:通用标准提案。
Addiction. 2005 Mar;100(3):299-303. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00995.x.
6
Promotion of smoking cessation in developing countries: a framework for urgent public health interventions.发展中国家的戒烟推广:紧急公共卫生干预框架
Thorax. 2004 Jul;59(7):623-30. doi: 10.1136/thx.2003.018820.
7
The effectiveness of workplace smoking cessation programmes: a meta-analysis of recent studies.工作场所戒烟计划的有效性:近期研究的荟萃分析。
Tob Control. 2004 Jun;13(2):197-204. doi: 10.1136/tc.2002.002915.
8
[Evaluation on the effects of community-based anti-smoking intervention].[基于社区的戒烟干预效果评估]
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2003 Sep;32(5):477-9.
9
Estimates of global mortality attributable to smoking in 2000.2000年全球归因于吸烟的死亡率估计。
Lancet. 2003 Sep 13;362(9387):847-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14338-3.
10
Mentholated cigarettes and smoking cessation: findings from COMMIT. Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation.薄荷醇香烟与戒烟:戒烟社区干预试验(COMMIT)的研究结果
Tob Control. 2002 Jun;11(2):135-9. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.2.135.