• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Developing a screening questionnaire for problem drinking in college students.

作者信息

Heck E J

机构信息

University Counseling Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence.

出版信息

J Am Coll Health. 1991 Mar;39(5):227-31. doi: 10.1080/07448481.1991.9936239.

DOI:10.1080/07448481.1991.9936239
PMID:1783706
Abstract

The CAGE questionnaire is one of several brief screening instruments that has been successful in detecting alcoholism in a general population. There is evidence, however, indicating that none of these instruments has sufficient validity for detecting the less severe pattern of problem drinking that is more typical of college students. This study analyzed survey data, including CAGE questions, to identify items that would have sufficient test operating characteristics more valid for screening problem drinkers. Problem and normal drinking patterns were defined by combining certain categories of quantity-frequency data with categories of alcohol-related problems. Problem and normal drinkers were identified as those students at the ends of the quantity-frequency/alcohol-problems continuum. Differences between the two groups in response frequencies to a 17-item alcohol-use survey were examined using chi-square analyses. Five items showing highly significant differences were identified, and sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were calculated at possible cutoff points. These items were (1) a positive response to any 2 of the 4 CAGE items, (2) reporting rarely or never choosing nonalcoholic beverages at social events, (3) driving under the influence at least 6 to 10 times or more in the last year, and (4) having started regular use of alcohol before the college years. At the recommended cutoff score for a positive test, the items have a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 87%, and positive predictive value of 52%. When used for screening in a population similar to this, it will fail to identify 12% of the problem drinkers and will falsely classify 13% of all normal drinkers as problem drinkers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

相似文献

1
Developing a screening questionnaire for problem drinking in college students.
J Am Coll Health. 1991 Mar;39(5):227-31. doi: 10.1080/07448481.1991.9936239.
2
Concurrent and prospective screening for problem drinking among college students.对大学生饮酒问题进行同步和前瞻性筛查。
J Adolesc Health. 1996 Apr;18(4):276-85. doi: 10.1016/1054-139X(95)00207-9.
3
The value of CAGE, CUGE, and AUDIT in screening for alcohol abuse and dependence among college freshmen.CAGE、CUGE和AUDIT在筛查大学新生酒精滥用和酒精依赖方面的价值。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000 Jan;24(1):53-7.
4
Beyond the "Binge" threshold: heavy drinking patterns and their association with alcohol involvement indices in college students.超越“暴饮”阈值:大学生的重度饮酒模式及其与酒精摄入指标的关联。
Addict Behav. 2008 Feb;33(2):225-34. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Sep 8.
5
Assessing alcohol consumption in general practice patients--a comparison between questionnaire and interview (findings of the Medical Research Council's general practice research framework study on lifestyle and health).评估全科医疗患者的饮酒情况——问卷调查与访谈的比较(医学研究委员会全科医疗研究框架关于生活方式与健康的研究结果)
Alcohol Alcohol. 1988;23(6):441-50.
6
Alcohol disorders in Canada as indicated by the CAGE questionnaire.加拿大酒精障碍情况通过CAGE问卷来表明。
CMAJ. 1997 Dec 1;157(11):1529-35.
7
Screening for hazardous drinking. Using the CAGE and measures of alcohol consumption in family practice.有害饮酒筛查。在家庭医疗中使用CAGE问卷及酒精摄入量测量方法。
Can Fam Physician. 1994 Sep;40:1546-53.
8
Screening for alcohol-related problems in the general population using CAGE and DSM-IV: characteristics of congruently and incongruently identified participants.使用CAGE和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM-IV)对普通人群中的酒精相关问题进行筛查:一致和不一致识别出的参与者的特征。
Addict Behav. 2004 Jul;29(5):867-78. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.02.057.
9
[Screening for problem alcohol drinking in the Swiss population: comparison between an ISPA-developed instrument and the CAGE questionnaire. The Swiss Institute for the Prevention of Alcoholism].[瑞士人群中问题饮酒的筛查:ISPA 开发的工具与 CAGE 问卷的比较。瑞士预防酒精中毒研究所]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1997 May 3;127(18):753-61.
10
[Quantity-frequency scale (QF Scale) for adolescent problem drinking].青少年问题饮酒的数量-频率量表(QF量表)
Arukoru Kenkyuto Yakubutsu Ison. 1994 Jun;29(3):168-78.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of illicit drug use among medical students in Northern Greece and association with smoking and alcohol use.希腊北部医科学生中非法药物使用的患病率及其与吸烟和饮酒的关联。
Hippokratia. 2017 Jan-Mar;21(1):13-18.
2
Examining Potential Substance Use Disorders Among Former Interscholastic Athletes.调查前校际运动员中潜在的物质使用障碍情况。
Subst Abus. 2015;36(4):400-6. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2014.988324. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
3
Subtypes of nonmedical prescription drug misuse.非医疗用途处方药滥用的亚型。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Jun 1;102(1-3):63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.01.007. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
4
Motives, diversion and routes of administration associated with nonmedical use of prescription opioids.与处方阿片类药物非医疗使用相关的动机、转移和给药途径。
Addict Behav. 2007 Mar;32(3):562-75. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.05.022. Epub 2006 Jul 13.
5
Simultaneous and concurrent polydrug use of alcohol and prescription drugs: prevalence, correlates, and consequences.酒精与处方药同时及并发的多药滥用:患病率、相关因素及后果。
J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Jul;67(4):529-37. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.529.
6
Sources of prescription drugs for illicit use.非法使用的处方药来源。
Addict Behav. 2005 Aug;30(7):1342-50. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.01.012.