• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

暴力风险量表-性犯罪者版本的有效性和可靠性:评估性犯罪者风险及评估治疗变化

The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change.

作者信息

Olver Mark E, Wong Stephen C P, Nicholaichuk Terry, Gordon Audrey

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, 9 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2007 Sep;19(3):318-29. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.318.

DOI:10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.318
PMID:17845123
Abstract

The Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version (VRS-SO) is a rating scale designed to assess risk and predict sexual recidivism, to measure and link treatment changes to sexual recidivism, and to inform the delivery of sexual offender treatment. The VRS-SO comprises 7 static and 17 dynamic items empirically or conceptually linked to sexual recidivism. Dynamic items with higher ratings identify treatment targets linked to sexual offending. A modified stages of change model assesses the offender's treatment readiness and change. File-based VRS-SO ratings were completed on 321 sex offenders followed up an average of 10 years post-release. VRS-SO scores predicted sexual and nonsexual violent recidivism post-release and demonstrated acceptable interrater reliability and concurrent validity. A factor analysis of the dynamic items generated 3 factors labeled Sexual Deviance, Criminality, and Treatment Responsivity, all of which predicted sexual recidivism and were differentially associated with different sex offender types. The dynamic items together made incremental contributions to sexual recidivism prediction after static risk was controlled for. Positive changes in the dynamic items, measured at pre- and posttreatment, were significantly related to reductions in sexual recidivism after risk and follow-up time were controlled for, suggesting that dynamic items are indeed dynamic or changeable in nature.

摘要

暴力风险量表-性犯罪者版本(VRS-SO)是一种评定量表,旨在评估风险并预测性再犯,衡量治疗变化与性再犯之间的关联,并为性犯罪者治疗的实施提供参考。VRS-SO由7个静态项目和17个动态项目组成,这些项目在经验或概念上与性再犯相关。评分较高的动态项目可确定与性犯罪相关的治疗目标。一种经过修改的改变阶段模型可评估犯罪者对治疗的准备情况和改变情况。基于档案的VRS-SO评分是对321名性犯罪者完成的,这些犯罪者在释放后平均随访了10年。VRS-SO分数可预测释放后的性暴力和非性暴力再犯情况,并显示出可接受的评分者间信度和同时效度。对动态项目进行的因素分析产生了3个因素,分别标记为性偏差、犯罪行为和治疗反应性,所有这些因素都可预测性再犯,并且与不同类型的性犯罪者存在不同的关联。在控制了静态风险后,动态项目共同对性再犯预测做出了增量贡献。在控制了风险和随访时间后,治疗前和治疗后测量的动态项目的积极变化与性再犯的减少显著相关,这表明动态项目在本质上确实是动态的或可改变的。

相似文献

1
The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change.暴力风险量表-性犯罪者版本的有效性和可靠性:评估性犯罪者风险及评估治疗变化
Psychol Assess. 2007 Sep;19(3):318-29. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.318.
2
Assessment of dynamic risk factors: an independent validation study of the Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender Version.评估动态风险因素:性犯罪者暴力风险量表的独立验证研究。
Sex Abuse. 2010 Jun;22(2):234-51. doi: 10.1177/1079063210369014.
3
Construct validity of the Violence Risk Scale--Sexual Offender Version for measuring sexual deviance.性罪犯暴力风险量表-性偏离分量表测量性偏离的结构效度。
Sex Abuse. 2009 Dec;21(4):474-92. doi: 10.1177/1079063209344990.
4
Therapeutic responses of psychopathic sexual offenders: treatment attrition, therapeutic change, and long-term recidivism.精神病态性犯罪者的治疗反应:治疗中断、治疗改变及长期再犯
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Apr;77(2):328-36. doi: 10.1037/a0015001.
5
Incorporating change information into sexual offender risk assessments using the violence risk scale-sexual offender version.使用暴力风险量表-性犯罪者版本将变化信息纳入性犯罪者风险评估。
Sex Abuse. 2014 Oct;26(5):472-99. doi: 10.1177/1079063213502679. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
6
A multisite examination of sexual violence risk and therapeutic change.一项关于性暴力风险与治疗变化的多地点研究。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Apr;82(2):312-24. doi: 10.1037/a0035340. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
7
Use of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender Version and the Stable 2007 to assess dynamic sexual violence risk in a sample of treated sexual offenders.使用性犯罪者暴力风险量表-修订版和稳定 2007 版评估治疗后的性犯罪者样本中的动态性暴力风险。
Psychol Assess. 2017 Mar;29(3):293-303. doi: 10.1037/pas0000345. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
8
Construct Validity of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender Version Instrument in a Multisite Sample of Treated Sexual Offenders.多地点治疗性犯罪者样本中暴力风险量表-性犯罪者版本工具的建构效度。
Assessment. 2018 Jan;25(1):40-55. doi: 10.1177/1073191116643819. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
9
Beyond static and dynamic risk factors: the incremental validity of release planning for predicting sex offender recidivism.超越静态和动态风险因素:释放计划对预测性犯罪者再犯的增量有效性。
J Interpers Violence. 2012 Jan;27(2):222-38. doi: 10.1177/0886260511416472. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
10
Validity and Reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Youth Sexual Offense Version.青少年性犯罪版暴力风险量表的有效性和可靠性。
Sex Abuse. 2020 Oct;32(7):826-849. doi: 10.1177/1079063219858064. Epub 2019 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The Predictive Validity of the SAPROF-SO for Success on Supervised Release From a Secure Treatment Center.SAPROF-SO对从安全治疗中心监督释放成功的预测效度。
Sex Abuse. 2025 Oct;37(7):759-786. doi: 10.1177/10790632251328958. Epub 2025 Apr 13.
2
Vulnerability to Incest - Findings From a Comparative Single-Case Study of the Onset of Intrafamilial Child Sexual Abuse.乱伦易感性——一项关于家庭内部儿童性虐待起始的比较单病例研究的结果
Sex Offending. 2024 Oct 8;19:e13087. doi: 10.5964/sotrap.13087. eCollection 2024.
3
First Steps in the Development of a New Measure of Attitudes Toward Sexual Offending Against Children.
针对儿童性犯罪态度新测量方法开发的初步步骤
Sex Offending. 2023 Dec 20;18:e11895. doi: 10.5964/sotrap.11895. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
The validity of the Violence Risk Scale (VRS) in a Portuguese sample of remand prisoners.暴力风险量表(VRS)在葡萄牙候审囚犯样本中的有效性。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2024 Jan 8;31(5):896-908. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2230578. eCollection 2024.
5
The Effect of Missing Item Data on the Relative Predictive Accuracy of Correctional Risk Assessment Tools.缺失项目数据对矫正风险评估工具相对预测准确性的影响。
Assessment. 2024 Dec;31(8):1643-1657. doi: 10.1177/10731911231225191. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
6
The Risk, Need, and Responsivity Relevance of Working Alliance in a Sexual Offense Treatment Program: Its Intersection With Psychopathy, Diversity, and Treatment Change.性犯罪治疗项目中工作联盟的风险、需求和反应敏感性:与精神病态、多样性和治疗变化的交叉。
Sex Abuse. 2024 Jun;36(4):383-417. doi: 10.1177/10790632231172161. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
7
Long Term Recidivism Rates Among Individuals at High Risk to Sexually Reoffend.高危性犯罪再犯者的长期累犯率。
Sex Abuse. 2024 Feb;36(1):3-32. doi: 10.1177/10790632221139166. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
8
Consistency and Construct Validity of the Five-Level System for Risk Communication Using Static and Dynamic Tools: An Investigation Using the Static-99R and VRS-SO.使用静态和动态工具的风险沟通五级系统的一致性和构建效度:使用静态-99R 和 VRS-SO 的调查。
Assessment. 2023 Apr;30(3):675-688. doi: 10.1177/10731911211061300. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
9
Critical considerations in the development and interpretation of common risk language.通用风险语言的开发与解读中的关键考量因素。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Jun 16;28(2):218-234. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1767719. eCollection 2021.
10
Sexual Violence Risk Assessment With Indigenous Men: Context, Controversies, and Current Findings.原住民男性的性暴力风险评估:背景、争议与当前研究发现。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2021 Jul 1;23(8):48. doi: 10.1007/s11920-021-01261-9.