• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用传统方法和Colilert-18系统对从饮用水库分离出的大肠菌群进行分子鉴定。

Molecular identification of coliform bacteria isolated from drinking water reservoirs with traditional methods and the Colilert-18 system.

作者信息

Kämpfer Peter, Nienhüser Anita, Packroff Gabriele, Wernicke Frank, Mehling Arnd, Nixdorf Katja, Fiedler Stefanie, Kolauch Claudia, Esser Michael

机构信息

Institut für Angewandte Mikrobiologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392 Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2008 Jul;211(3-4):374-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2007.07.021. Epub 2007 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijheh.2007.07.021
PMID:17870668
Abstract

The accuracy of a traditional method (lactose utilization with acid and gas production) for the detection of coliform bacteria and E. coli was tested in comparison with method ISO 9308-1 (based on acid formation from lactose) and the Colilert-18 system (detection of beta-galactosidase). A total of 345 isolates were identified after isolation from water samples using API 20E strips. The Colilert-18 led to the highest number of positive findings (95% of the isolates were assigned to coliforms), whereas the ISO-9308-1 method resulted only in 29% coliform findings. With the traditional method only 15% were rated positive. Most of the isolates were identified by the API 20E system as Enterobacter spp. (species of the Enterobacter cloacae complex), Serratia spp., Citrobacter spp.and Klebsiella spp.; but species identification remained vague in several cases. A more detailed identification of 126 pure cultures by using 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and analysis of the hsp60 gene resulted in the identification of Enterobacter nimipressuralis, E. amnigenus, E. asburiae, E. hormaechei, and Serratia fonticola as predominat coliforms. These species are beta-galactosidase positive, but show acid formation from lactose often after a prolonged incubation time. They are often not of fecal origin and may interfere with the ability to accurately detect coliforms of fecal origin.

摘要

与ISO 9308-1方法(基于乳糖产酸)和Colilert-18系统(检测β-半乳糖苷酶)相比,测试了一种传统方法(利用乳糖产酸产气)检测大肠菌群和大肠杆菌的准确性。使用API 20E试纸条从水样中分离出345株菌株。Colilert-18系统检测出的阳性结果数量最多(95%的菌株被归类为大肠菌群),而ISO-9308-1方法仅检测出29%的大肠菌群。传统方法检测出的阳性率仅为15%。大多数菌株经API 20E系统鉴定为肠杆菌属(阴沟肠杆菌复合体的种)、沙雷氏菌属、柠檬酸杆菌属和克雷伯氏菌属;但在一些情况下,菌种鉴定仍不明确。通过16S rRNA基因序列分析和hsp60基因分析对126株纯培养物进行更详细的鉴定,结果表明,阴沟肠杆菌、水生肠杆菌、阿氏肠杆菌、霍氏肠杆菌和丰蒂科拉沙雷氏菌是主要的大肠菌群。这些菌种β-半乳糖苷酶呈阳性,但通常在长时间培养后才会从乳糖产酸。它们通常并非源自粪便,可能会干扰准确检测源自粪便的大肠菌群的能力。

相似文献

1
Molecular identification of coliform bacteria isolated from drinking water reservoirs with traditional methods and the Colilert-18 system.用传统方法和Colilert-18系统对从饮用水库分离出的大肠菌群进行分子鉴定。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2008 Jul;211(3-4):374-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2007.07.021. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
2
Identification of coliform genera recovered from water using different technologies.利用不同技术从水中回收的大肠菌类属的鉴定。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009 Dec;49(6):685-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02726.x. Epub 2009 Aug 22.
3
[Comparative studies of fresh and seawater for the determination of total coliform and fecal coliform bacteria according to the European Economic Community guideline 76/160 (bathing water) by the use of the most-probable-number method with BRILA-MUG broth and differentiation according to the drinking water ordinance].根据欧洲经济共同体第76/160号指南(沐浴水),采用最可能数法,使用BRILA-MUG肉汤测定总大肠菌群和粪大肠菌群,并按照饮用水条例进行区分,对淡水和海水进行比较研究
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1991 May;191(5-6):523-38.
4
Characterization of bacterial coliform occurrences in different zones of a drinking water distribution system.饮用水分配系统不同区域中大肠菌群细菌出现情况的特征分析。
J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Mar;102(3):711-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03141.x.
5
Analytical limits of four beta-glucuronidase and beta-galactosidase-based commercial culture methods used to detect Escherichia coli and total coliforms.用于检测大肠杆菌和总大肠菌群的四种基于β-葡萄糖醛酸酶和β-半乳糖苷酶的商业培养方法的分析限度。
J Microbiol Methods. 2008 Dec;75(3):506-14. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.08.001. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
6
Evaluation of the lactose Tergitol-7, m-Endo LES, Colilert 18, Readycult Coliforms 100, Water-Check-100, 3M Petrifilm EC and DryCult Coliform test methods for detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in water samples.评估乳糖-特吉托7、m-内毒素检测法、Colilert 18、Readycult大肠菌群100、Water-Check-100、3M Petrifilm EC和DryCult大肠菌群检测方法用于检测水样中的总大肠菌群和大肠杆菌。
Water Res. 2006 Oct;40(17):3249-56. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.06.024. Epub 2006 Aug 17.
7
A comparison of ten USEPA approved total coliform/E. coli tests.十种美国环境保护局(USEPA)批准的总大肠菌群/大肠杆菌检测方法的比较。
J Water Health. 2007 Jun;5(2):267-82.
8
[Experiences with the detection of E. coli and coliform bacteria with reference to the drinking water regulation of 1986].[关于1986年饮用水规定中大肠杆菌和大肠菌群检测的经验]
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med. 1989 Feb;187(3):209-5.
9
Comparative performance of Colisure (TM) and accepted methods in the detection of chlorine-injured total coliforms and E.coli.Colisure(商标名)与公认方法在检测氯损伤的总大肠菌群和大肠杆菌方面的比较性能
Water Sci Technol. 1995;31(5-6):259-61.
10
[Isolation and characterization of injured coliforms from the drinking water distribution network of La Plata, Argentina].[从阿根廷拉普拉塔市饮用水分配网络中分离和鉴定受伤的大肠菌群]
Rev Argent Microbiol. 2001 Jan-Mar;33(1):9-14.

引用本文的文献

1
Microbial and physicochemical water quality changes within distribution and premise plumbing systems during a chlorine conversion.在氯转换过程中,配水系统和建筑物内部管道系统内的微生物和物理化学水质变化。
PLOS Water. 2024 Feb 8;3(2):1-23. doi: 10.1371/journal.pwat.0000181.
2
Improving drinking water quality through proficiency testing-the impact of testing method and accreditation status on detection by Canadian environmental testing laboratories.通过能力验证提高饮用水质量——检测方法和认可状态对加拿大环境检测实验室检测结果的影响
Front Mol Biosci. 2024 May 1;11:1338549. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1338549. eCollection 2024.
3
Evaluation of a Tetracycline-Resistant Enumeration Method for Correctly Classifying in Environmental Waters in Kentucky, USA.
美国肯塔基州环境水体中四环素抗性菌正确分类计数方法的评估
Pathogens. 2023 Aug 28;12(9):1090. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12091090.
4
: A Promising Supplementary Indicator of Microbial Drinking Water Quality in Municipal Engineered Water Systems.城市工程水系统中微生物饮用水质量的一个有前景的补充指标。
Front Environ Sci. 2021 Nov 10;9:1-22. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.684319.
5
Identification of Risk Areas for Intestinal Schistosomiasis, Based on Malacological and Environmental Data and on Reported Human Cases.基于贝类学和环境数据以及报告的人类病例确定肠道血吸虫病的风险区域
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 6;8:642348. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.642348. eCollection 2021.
6
Draft Genome Sequences of Enterobacter spp., spp., and spp., Coliform Bacteria from Drinking Water Reservoirs and Lakes.来自饮用水水库和湖泊的大肠埃希菌属、 属和 属大肠菌群细菌的基因组序列草图
Microbiol Resour Announc. 2021 Aug 12;10(32):e0062221. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00622-21.
7
Wide Distribution and Specific Resistance Pattern to Third-Generation Cephalosporins of Complex Members in Humans and in the Environment in Guadeloupe (French West Indies).瓜德罗普岛(法属西印度群岛)人类和环境中复杂菌群对第三代头孢菌素的广泛分布及特异性耐药模式
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jun 25;12:628058. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.628058. eCollection 2021.
8
Evaluation of Polymerase Chain Reaction for Detecting Coliform Bacteria in Drinking Water Sources.聚合酶链反应检测饮用水源中大肠菌群的评估
Adv Biomed Res. 2017 Oct 16;6:130. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.216783. eCollection 2017.
9
The Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) identification versus biochemical tests: a study with enterobacteria from a dairy cattle environment.基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)鉴定与生化试验的比较:一项针对奶牛场环境中肠杆菌的研究
Braz J Microbiol. 2017 Jan-Mar;48(1):132-138. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.07.025. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
10
Particular Distribution of Enterobacter cloacae Strains Isolated from Urinary Tract Infection within Clonal Complexes.尿路感染者分离出的阴沟肠杆菌菌株在克隆复合体中的特定分布
Iran Biomed J. 2016;20(1):49-55. doi: 10.7508/ibj.2016.01.007. Epub 2015 Oct 25.