Unprincipled QALYs: a response to Cubbon.
作者信息
Harris J
机构信息
Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, University of Manchester.
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 1991 Dec;17(4):185-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.17.4.185.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Unprincipled QALYs: a response to Cubbon.无原则的质量调整生命年：对卡本的回应
J Med Ethics. 1991 Dec;17(4):185-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.17.4.185.
2
Double jeopardy and the use of QALYs in health care allocation.双重风险与质量调整生命年在医疗保健资源分配中的应用。
J Med Ethics. 1995 Jun;21(3):144-50. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.3.144.
3
Rationing health care.
Lancet. 1987 Mar 14;1(8533):615-6.
4
Quality-adjusted life years: ethical implications and the Oregon plan.质量调整生命年：伦理影响与俄勒冈计划
Issues Law Med. 1992 Spring;7(4):429-41.
5
Balancing principles, QALYs, and the straw men of resource allocation.权衡原则、质量调整生命年与资源分配的稻草人
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(4):48-50. doi: 10.1080/15265161003632971.
6
The principle of QALY maximisation as the basis for allocating health care resources.以质量调整生命年最大化作为分配医疗保健资源的基础的原则。
J Med Ethics. 1991 Dec;17(4):181-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.17.4.181.
7
Quality of life measures in health care. III: Resource allocation.
BMJ. 1992 Nov 14;305(6863):1205-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6863.1205.
8
QALYs: are they enough? A health economist's perspective.质量调整生命年：它们足够了吗？一位卫生经济学家的视角。
J Med Ethics. 1989 Sep;15(3):148-52. doi: 10.1136/jme.15.3.148.
9
QALYs, lotteries and veils: the story so far.质量调整生命年、彩票与无知之幕：迄今为止的故事。
J Med Ethics. 1996 Aug;22(4):195-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.4.195.
10
Double jeopardy and the veil of ignorance--a reply.
J Med Ethics. 1995 Jun;21(3):151-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.3.151.
引用本文的文献
1
It's time for rational rationing.是时候进行合理配给了。
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Jul;63(612):e508-9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X669293.
2
Societal preferences for standard health insurance coverage in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study.荷兰社会对标准医疗保险覆盖范围的偏好：一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2012 Apr 5;2(2):e001021. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001021. Print 2012.
3
The way around health economics' dead end.突破健康经济学死胡同的方法。
Health Care Anal. 1995 Aug;3(3):205-20. doi: 10.1007/BF02197670.
4
The reliability of cost-utility estimates in cost-per-QALY league tables .成本效益分析联盟表中成本效用估计的可靠性。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 May;3(5):345-53. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199303050-00002.
5
Why bioethicists have nothing useful to say about health care rationing.为何生物伦理学家对医疗资源分配无话可说。
J Med Ethics. 1995 Oct;21(5):288-91. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.5.288.
6
Measuring the impact of menopausal symptoms on quality of life.测量更年期症状对生活质量的影响。
BMJ. 1993 Oct 2;307(6908):836-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6908.836.
7
Good quality quality? Some methodological issues.高质量？一些方法学问题。
J R Soc Med. 1993 Aug;86(8):440-3.
8
Resource allocation--what is the first priority?资源分配——首要优先事项是什么？
J Med Ethics. 1992 Jun;18(2):99-100. doi: 10.1136/jme.18.2.99.
9
Unprincipled QALYs: a response to Harris.无原则的质量调整生命年：对哈里斯的回应
J Med Ethics. 1992 Jun;18(2):100. doi: 10.1136/jme.18.2.100.
10
Effect of subject age on costs of screening for colorectal cancer.受试者年龄对结直肠癌筛查成本的影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Dec;46(6):577-81. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.6.577.
本文引用的文献
1
The principle of QALY maximisation as the basis for allocating health care resources.以质量调整生命年最大化作为分配医疗保健资源的基础的原则。
J Med Ethics. 1991 Dec;17(4):181-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.17.4.181.
Zotero 插件