Cubbon J
Department of Public Health Medicine, University of Birmingham.
J Med Ethics. 1991 Dec;17(4):181-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.17.4.181.
This paper presents a case for allocating health care resources so as to maximise Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). Throughout parallels are drawn with the grounds for adopting utilitarianism. QALYs are desirable because they are essential for human flourishing and goal-attainment. In conditions of scarcity the principle of QALY maximisation may involve unequal treatment of different groups of people; and it is argued that this is not objectionable. Doctors in their dealings with patients should not be continually consulting the principle (though it can sometimes be useful); instead by following existing ethical codes more QALYs will be produced overall. In the formulation of policy, however, the principle should be applied in a thoroughgoing way and, if it is, it will not have some of the counterintuitive consequences it may have in interpersonal situations.
本文提出了一种关于分配医疗保健资源以实现质量调整生命年(QALYs)最大化的观点。文中始终将其与采用功利主义的理由进行类比。质量调整生命年是可取的,因为它们对人类的繁荣和目标实现至关重要。在资源稀缺的情况下,质量调整生命年最大化原则可能涉及对不同人群的不平等对待;并且有人认为这并非不可接受。医生在与患者打交道时不应持续参照该原则(尽管有时可能有用);相反,遵循现有的道德准则总体上会产生更多的质量调整生命年。然而,在政策制定中,该原则应得到彻底应用,并且如果这样做,它将不会产生一些在人际情境中可能出现的违反直觉的后果。