Suppr超能文献

通过互联网对青少年进行抑郁症筛查:两份筛查问卷的敏感性和特异性

Screening of depression in adolescents through the Internet : sensitivity and specificity of two screening questionnaires.

作者信息

Cuijpers Pim, Boluijt Petra, van Straten Annemieke

机构信息

Dept. of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 1, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;17(1):32-8. doi: 10.1007/s00787-007-0631-2. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

Abstract

The Internet may offer new opportunities for treating depressed adolescents. However, before such treatments are possible, well-validated screening instruments are needed. In the current study, we validate two Internet-based screening instruments for depression among adolescents, the major depression inventory (MDI), and the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale (CES-D). A total of 1,392 adolescents, recruited through high schools and the Internet, filled in the online questionnaires. Of these, 243 (17%) were interviewed with the MINI diagnostic interview to assess the presence of a mood disorder. Cronbach's alpha was high for both the CES-D (0.93) and the MDI (0.88), and both correlated highly with each other (0.88; P < .001). The scores on both instruments were significantly increased in all subjects with a mood disorder, whether current or lifetime, except for lifetime minor depression. In the ROC analyses, high areas under the curve were found for the MDI (0.89) and CES-D (0.90). The best cut-off point for the MDI was 19 (sensitivity: 90.48; specificity: 71.53), and for the CES-D it was 22 (sensitivity: 90.48; specificity: 74.31). We conclude that the MDI and CES-D are reliable and valid instruments that can be used for this screening.

摘要

互联网可能为治疗抑郁青少年提供新的机会。然而,在开展此类治疗之前,需要经过充分验证的筛查工具。在本研究中,我们验证了两种基于互联网的青少年抑郁筛查工具,即重度抑郁量表(MDI)和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)。通过高中和互联网招募了1392名青少年,他们填写了在线问卷。其中,243人(17%)接受了MINI诊断访谈以评估是否存在情绪障碍。CES-D(0.93)和MDI(0.88)的克朗巴哈系数均较高,且两者之间的相关性也很高(0.88;P <.001)。除了既往轻度抑郁外,所有患有情绪障碍的受试者(无论是当前还是既往)在这两种工具上的得分均显著升高。在ROC分析中,MDI(0.89)和CES-D(0.90)的曲线下面积较高。MDI的最佳截断点为19(敏感性:90.48;特异性:71.53),CES-D的最佳截断点为22(敏感性:90.48;特异性:74.31)。我们得出结论,MDI和CES-D是可靠且有效的工具,可用于此类筛查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验