Cuijpers Pim, Boluijt Petra, van Straten Annemieke
Dept. of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 1, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, The Netherlands.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;17(1):32-8. doi: 10.1007/s00787-007-0631-2. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
The Internet may offer new opportunities for treating depressed adolescents. However, before such treatments are possible, well-validated screening instruments are needed. In the current study, we validate two Internet-based screening instruments for depression among adolescents, the major depression inventory (MDI), and the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale (CES-D). A total of 1,392 adolescents, recruited through high schools and the Internet, filled in the online questionnaires. Of these, 243 (17%) were interviewed with the MINI diagnostic interview to assess the presence of a mood disorder. Cronbach's alpha was high for both the CES-D (0.93) and the MDI (0.88), and both correlated highly with each other (0.88; P < .001). The scores on both instruments were significantly increased in all subjects with a mood disorder, whether current or lifetime, except for lifetime minor depression. In the ROC analyses, high areas under the curve were found for the MDI (0.89) and CES-D (0.90). The best cut-off point for the MDI was 19 (sensitivity: 90.48; specificity: 71.53), and for the CES-D it was 22 (sensitivity: 90.48; specificity: 74.31). We conclude that the MDI and CES-D are reliable and valid instruments that can be used for this screening.
互联网可能为治疗抑郁青少年提供新的机会。然而,在开展此类治疗之前,需要经过充分验证的筛查工具。在本研究中,我们验证了两种基于互联网的青少年抑郁筛查工具,即重度抑郁量表(MDI)和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)。通过高中和互联网招募了1392名青少年,他们填写了在线问卷。其中,243人(17%)接受了MINI诊断访谈以评估是否存在情绪障碍。CES-D(0.93)和MDI(0.88)的克朗巴哈系数均较高,且两者之间的相关性也很高(0.88;P <.001)。除了既往轻度抑郁外,所有患有情绪障碍的受试者(无论是当前还是既往)在这两种工具上的得分均显著升高。在ROC分析中,MDI(0.89)和CES-D(0.90)的曲线下面积较高。MDI的最佳截断点为19(敏感性:90.48;特异性:71.53),CES-D的最佳截断点为22(敏感性:90.48;特异性:74.31)。我们得出结论,MDI和CES-D是可靠且有效的工具,可用于此类筛查。