• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[基因羊膜穿刺术后的妊娠与分娩过程及新生儿状况]

[The course of pregnancy and delivery and the state of the newborns after genetic amniocentesis].

作者信息

Ciach Katarzyna, Preis Krzysztof, Swiatkowska-Freund Małgorzata, Wydra Dariusz

机构信息

Katedra Perinatologii Klinika Połoznictwa AM w Gdańsku.

出版信息

Ginekol Pol. 2007 Jun;78(6):454-9.

PMID:17899701
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The risk of fetal loss after amniocentesis is 0.2-1%. The aim of the study was to compare the course of pregnancy and delivery and the state of the newborn in patients after genetic amniocentesis and in the control group.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

783 patients who underwent amniocentesis at the Department of Obstetrics of Medical University of Gdansk in 1996-2003 and 221 women who did not undergo amniocentesis.

RESULTS

Fetal loss occurred in 8 pregnancies (3.8%) after amniocentesis and in 12 (5.4%) p=0.37 in the control group. There was no significant statistical difference between the amniocentesis group and the control group comparing complications during pregnancy such as gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy induced hypertension, urinary tract infections. Cesarean section was more often performed in the amniocentesis group than in the control group, statistical difference p=0.003. Most often (28.09%) there was an elective cesarean section because of advanced maternal age without any obstetrician cause. The frequency of pneumonia, respiratory infections and congenital malformations in the first weeks of life was more frequent in the amniocetesis group.

CONCLUSIONS

Invasive prenatal diagnosis has no influence of the frequency of complications during pregnancy and delivery.

摘要

目的

羊膜腔穿刺术后胎儿丢失的风险为0.2 - 1%。本研究的目的是比较基因羊膜腔穿刺术后患者与对照组的妊娠和分娩过程以及新生儿状况。

材料与方法

1996 - 2003年在格但斯克医科大学妇产科接受羊膜腔穿刺术的783例患者和221例未接受羊膜腔穿刺术的女性。

结果

羊膜腔穿刺术后8例妊娠(3.8%)发生胎儿丢失,对照组为12例(5.4%),p = 0.37。在比较妊娠期间并发症如妊娠期糖尿病、妊娠高血压、尿路感染时,羊膜腔穿刺术组与对照组之间无显著统计学差异。羊膜腔穿刺术组剖宫产的实施频率高于对照组,统计学差异p = 0.003。最常见的情况(28.09%)是因产妇年龄较大而进行选择性剖宫产,无任何产科原因。羊膜腔穿刺术组出生后第一周内肺炎、呼吸道感染和先天性畸形的发生率更高。

结论

侵入性产前诊断对妊娠和分娩期间并发症的发生率没有影响。

相似文献

1
[The course of pregnancy and delivery and the state of the newborns after genetic amniocentesis].[基因羊膜穿刺术后的妊娠与分娩过程及新生儿状况]
Ginekol Pol. 2007 Jun;78(6):454-9.
2
[The course of pregnancy and delivery in women after genetic amniocentesis before and after 35 years of age].[35岁及以上女性在遗传羊膜穿刺术后的妊娠和分娩过程]
Ginekol Pol. 2008 Jan;79(1):12-6.
3
[Analysis of the course of pregnancy and labor after genetic amniocenthesis in women after 35 years of age].[35岁以上女性接受遗传羊膜腔穿刺术后妊娠及分娩过程分析]
Ginekol Pol. 2011 Oct;82(10):738-42.
4
[Complications rate and pregnancy outcome in women who underwent early and mid trimester amniocentesis].[孕早期和孕中期羊膜腔穿刺术女性的并发症发生率及妊娠结局]
Ginekol Pol. 2007 Jun;78(6):443-8.
5
[Early or late amniocentesis--which method is safer?].[早期或晚期羊膜穿刺术——哪种方法更安全?]
Ginekol Pol. 2007 May;78(5):400-4.
6
[Pregnancy and delivery course in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus].[妊娠期糖尿病患者的妊娠与分娩过程]
Ginekol Pol. 2003 Oct;74(10):1200-7.
7
Maternal obesity as a perinatal risk factor.孕产妇肥胖作为一种围产期风险因素。
Ginekol Pol. 2009 May;80(5):334-7.
8
[Course of twin pregnancies and labors in the 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw].[华沙医科大学第一妇产科双胎妊娠及分娩过程]
Ginekol Pol. 2004 Nov;75(11):840-6.
9
[Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].[1991年至2000年期间,什切青波美拉尼亚医科大学妊娠与分娩科病理诊所资料中剖宫产指征的演变]
Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2003;49:173-92.
10
[The analysis of twin pregnancy and labour in the Department of Obstetrics, Medical Academy, Gdańsk].[格但斯克医学院妇产科双胞胎妊娠与分娩分析]
Ginekol Pol. 2005 Mar;76(3):214-8.