Garoff-Eaton Rachel J, Kensinger Elizabeth A, Schacter Daniel L
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Learn Mem. 2007 Oct 1;14(10):684-92. doi: 10.1101/lm.695707. Print 2007 Oct.
False recognition, broadly defined as a claim to remember something that was not encountered previously, can arise for multiple reasons. For instance, a distinction can be made between conceptual false recognition (i.e., false alarms resulting from semantic or associative similarities between studied and tested items) and perceptual false recognition (i.e., false alarms resulting from physical similarities between studied and tested items). Although false recognition has been associated with frontal cortex activity, it is unclear whether this frontal activity can be modulated by the precise relationship between studied and falsely remembered items. We used event-related fMRI to examine the neural basis of conceptual compared with perceptual false recognition. Results revealed preferential activity in multiple frontal cortex regions during conceptual false recognition, which likely reflected increased semantic processing during conceptual (but not perceptual) memory errors. These results extend recent reports that different types of false recognition can rely on dissociable neural substrates, and they indicate that the frontal activity that is often observed during false compared with true recognition can be modulated by the relationship between studied and tested items.
错误识别,广义上定义为声称记得之前未遇到过的事物,可能由多种原因引起。例如,可以区分概念性错误识别(即由学习和测试项目之间的语义或关联相似性导致的误报)和感知性错误识别(即由学习和测试项目之间的物理相似性导致的误报)。尽管错误识别与额叶皮层活动有关,但尚不清楚这种额叶活动是否能被学习和错误记忆项目之间的精确关系所调节。我们使用事件相关功能磁共振成像来研究概念性错误识别与感知性错误识别相比的神经基础。结果显示,在概念性错误识别过程中,多个额叶皮层区域出现优先活动,这可能反映了在概念性(而非感知性)记忆错误期间语义加工的增加。这些结果扩展了最近的报告,即不同类型的错误识别可能依赖于可分离的神经基质,并且它们表明,与真实识别相比,在错误识别期间经常观察到的额叶活动可以被学习和测试项目之间的关系所调节。