The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Memory. 2024 Nov;32(10):1271-1285. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2316169. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
Schemas allow us to make assumptions about the world based upon previous experiences and aid in memory organisation and retrieval. However, a reliance on schemas may also result in increased false memories to schematically related lures. Prior neuroimaging work has linked schematic processing in memory tasks to activity in prefrontal, visual, and temporal regions. Yet, it is unclear what type of processing in these regions underlies memory errors. The current study examined where schematic lures exhibit greater neural similarity to schematic targets, leading to this memory error, as compared to neural overlap with non-schematic lures, which, like schematic lures, are novel items at retrieval. Results showed that patterns of neural activity in ventromedial prefrontal cortex, medial frontal gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, hippocampus, and occipital cortices exhibited greater neural pattern similarity for schematic targets and schematic lures than between schematic lures and non-schematic lures. As such, results suggest that schematic membership, and not object history, may be more critical to the neural processes underlying memory retrieval in the context of a strong schema.
模式允许我们根据以往的经验对世界做出假设,并有助于组织和检索记忆。然而,对模式的依赖也可能导致与模式相关的诱饵产生更多的虚假记忆。先前的神经影像学研究将记忆任务中的模式处理与前额叶、视觉和颞叶区域的活动联系起来。然而,目前尚不清楚这些区域中的哪种类型的处理是导致记忆错误的基础。本研究考察了在记忆错误中,与模式目标相比,模式诱饵在哪些区域表现出更大的神经相似性,而与非模式诱饵相比,模式诱饵与非模式诱饵在检索时都是新颖的项目。结果表明,腹内侧前额叶皮质、内侧额回、中颞叶、海马和枕叶皮质的神经活动模式对于模式目标和模式诱饵的神经模式相似性大于模式诱饵和非模式诱饵之间的相似性。因此,结果表明,在强烈模式的背景下,模式成员身份而不是物体历史可能对记忆检索的神经过程更为关键。