Hildebrand Peter Werner, Günther Stefan, Goede Andrean, Forrest Lucy, Frömmel Cornelius, Preissner Robert
Institute of Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Biophys J. 2008 Mar 15;94(6):1945-53. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.110395. Epub 2007 Oct 5.
The recent structural elucidation of about one dozen channels (in which we include transporters) has provided further evidence that these membrane proteins typically undergo large movements during their function. However, it is still not well understood how these proteins achieve the necessary trade-off between stability and mobility. To identify specific structural properties of channels, we compared the helix-packing and hydrogen-bonding patterns of channels with those of membrane coils; the latter is a class of membrane proteins whose structures are expected to be more rigid. We describe in detail how in channels, helix pairs are usually arranged in packing motifs with large crossing angles (|tau| approximately 40 degrees ), where the (small) side chains point away from the packing core and the backbones of the two helices are in close contact. We found that this contributes to a significant enrichment of Calpha-H...O bonds and to a packing geometry where right-handed parallel (tau = -40 degrees +/- 10 degrees ) and antiparallel (tau = +140 degrees +/- 25 degrees ) arrangements are equally preferred. By sharp contrast, the interdigitation and hydrogen bonding of side chains in helix pairs of membrane coils results in narrowly distributed left-handed antiparallel arrangements with crossing angles tau = -160 degrees +/- 10 degrees (|tau| approximately 20 degrees ). In addition, we show that these different helix-packing modes of the two types of membrane proteins correspond to specific hydrogen-bonding patterns. In particular, in channels, three times as many of the hydrogen-bonded helix pairs are found in parallel right-handed motifs than are non-hydrogen-bonded helix pairs. Finally, we discuss how the presence of weak hydrogen bonds, water-containing cavities, and right-handed crossing angles may facilitate the required conformational flexibility between helix pairs of channels while maintaining sufficient structural stability.
最近对大约一打通道(我们将转运蛋白也包括在内)的结构解析进一步证明,这些膜蛋白在发挥功能时通常会发生大幅度移动。然而,这些蛋白如何在稳定性和流动性之间实现必要的平衡仍未得到很好的理解。为了确定通道的特定结构特性,我们将通道的螺旋堆积和氢键模式与膜螺旋的进行了比较;后者是一类结构预计更为刚性的膜蛋白。我们详细描述了在通道中,螺旋对通常如何以大交叉角(|τ|约为40度)排列在堆积基序中,其中(小的)侧链远离堆积核心,两条螺旋的主链紧密接触。我们发现,这有助于显著富集Cα-H...O键,并形成一种堆积几何结构,其中右手平行(τ = -40度±10度)和反平行(τ = +140度±25度)排列同样受到青睐。与之形成鲜明对比的是,膜螺旋的螺旋对中侧链的相互交错和氢键作用导致了交叉角τ = -160度±10度(|τ|约为20度)的窄分布左手反平行排列。此外,我们表明这两种类型膜蛋白的不同螺旋堆积模式对应于特定的氢键模式。特别是,在通道中,形成氢键的螺旋对在右手平行基序中的数量是非氢键螺旋对的三倍。最后,我们讨论了弱氢键、含水腔和右手交叉角的存在如何在保持足够结构稳定性的同时,促进通道螺旋对之间所需的构象灵活性。