Sullivan Jeremy R, Riccio Cynthia A
University of Texas at San Antonio, Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Adult & Higher Education, San Anthonio, TX 78207-4415, USA.
J Atten Disord. 2007 Nov;11(3):398-406. doi: 10.1177/1087054707299399.
Behavioral rating scales are common instruments used in evaluations of ADHD and executive function. It is important to explore how different diagnostic groups perform on these measures, as this information can be used to provide criterion-related validity evidence for the measures.
Data from 92 children and adolescents were used to examine differences among participants in a No Diagnosis group, ADHD group, and Other Clinical group in terms of parent and teacher ratings on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) and Conners' Rating Scales Revised-Short Form.
Participants in the ADHD and Other Clinical groups generally received similar scores on the scales, and both groups were generally rated higher in ADHD characteristics and executive dysfunction than were participants in the No Diagnosis group.
Although the measures were successful at distinguishing clinical from nonclinical participants, their ability to distinguish among different clinical groups deserves further investigation.
行为评定量表是用于评估注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和执行功能的常用工具。探究不同诊断组在这些测量指标上的表现非常重要,因为这些信息可用于为这些测量提供与标准相关的效度证据。
来自92名儿童和青少年的数据用于检验无诊断组、ADHD组和其他临床组的参与者在执行功能行为评定量表(BRIEF)和康纳斯修订版简式评定量表上家长和教师评分的差异。
ADHD组和其他临床组的参与者在量表上通常获得相似的分数,并且两组在ADHD特征和执行功能障碍方面的评分普遍高于无诊断组的参与者。
尽管这些测量成功地区分了临床参与者和非临床参与者,但它们区分不同临床组的能力值得进一步研究。