Suppr超能文献

硫酸葡萄糖胺与一种多草药补充剂缓解膝关节骨关节炎的比较:一项随机对照试验[ISRCTN25438351]

Comparison of glucosamine sulfate and a polyherbal supplement for the relief of osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN25438351].

作者信息

Mehta Komal, Gala Jayesh, Bhasale Surendra, Naik Sattayasheel, Modak Millind, Thakur Harshad, Deo Nivedita, Miller Mark J S

机构信息

1Vedic Lifesciences, Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India.

出版信息

BMC Complement Altern Med. 2007 Oct 31;7:34. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-7-34.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of a dietary supplement derived from South American botanicals was compared to glucosamine sulfate in osteoarthritis subjects in a Mumbai-based multi-center, randomized, double-blind study.

METHODS

Subjects (n = 95) were screened and randomized to receive glucosamine sulfate (n = 47, 1500 mg/day) or reparagen (n = 48, 1800 mg/day), a polyherbal consisting of 300 mg of vincaria (Uncaria guianensis) and 1500 mg of RNI 249 (Lepidium meyenii) administered orally, twice daily. Primary efficacy variable was response rate based on a 20% improvement in WOMAC pain scores. Additional outcomes were WOMAC scores for pain, stiffness and function, visual analog score (VAS) for pain, with assessments at 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks. Tolerability, investigator and subject global assessments and rescue medication consumption (paracetamol) were measured together with safety assessments including vital signs and laboratory based assays.

RESULTS

Subject randomization was effective: age, gender and disease status distribution was similar in both groups. The response rates (20% reduction in WOMAC pain) were substantial for both glucosamine (89%) and reparagen (94%) and supported by investigator and subject assessments. Using related criteria response rates to reparagen were favorable when compared to glucosamine. Compared to baseline both treatments showed significant benefits in WOMAC and VAS outcomes within one week (P < 0.05), with a similar, progressive improvement over the course of the 8 week treatment protocol (45-62% reduction in WOMAC or VAS scores). Tolerability was excellent, no serious adverse events were noted and safety parameters were unchanged. Rescue medication use was significantly lower in the reparagen group (p < 0.01) at each assessment period. Serum IGF-1 levels were unaltered by treatments.

CONCLUSION

Both reparagen and glucosamine sulfate produced substantial improvements in pain, stiffness and function in subjects with osteoarthritis. Response rates were high and the safety profile was excellent, with significantly less rescue medication use with reparagen. Reparagen represents a new natural productive alternative in the management of joint health.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN25438351.

摘要

背景

在孟买进行的一项多中心、随机、双盲研究中,将一种源自南美植物的膳食补充剂与硫酸葡萄糖胺对骨关节炎患者的疗效和安全性进行了比较。

方法

对95名受试者进行筛查并随机分组,分别接受硫酸葡萄糖胺(47名,1500毫克/天)或reparagen(48名,1800毫克/天),reparagen是一种复方草药制剂,包含300毫克钩藤(圭亚那钩藤)和1500毫克RNI 249(玛咖),每日口服两次。主要疗效变量是基于WOMAC疼痛评分改善20%的反应率。其他结果包括WOMAC疼痛、僵硬和功能评分,疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS),在第1、2、4、6和8周进行评估。测量耐受性、研究者和受试者总体评估以及急救药物消耗(对乙酰氨基酚),同时进行包括生命体征和实验室检测在内的安全性评估。

结果

受试者随机分组有效:两组的年龄、性别和疾病状态分布相似。硫酸葡萄糖胺(89%)和reparagen(94%)的反应率(WOMAC疼痛降低20%)都很高,并得到研究者和受试者评估的支持。根据相关标准,与硫酸葡萄糖胺相比,reparagen的反应率更有利。与基线相比,两种治疗在一周内WOMAC和VAS结果均显示出显著益处(P<0.05),在8周治疗方案过程中呈现相似的渐进改善(WOMAC或VAS评分降低45 - 62%)。耐受性良好,未观察到严重不良事件,安全性参数未改变。在每个评估期,reparagen组的急救药物使用显著更低(p<0.01)。治疗未改变血清IGF - 1水平。

结论

reparagen和硫酸葡萄糖胺均使骨关节炎患者的疼痛、僵硬和功能有显著改善。反应率高,安全性良好,reparagen的急救药物使用显著更少。Reparagen是关节健康管理中的一种新的天然有效替代方案。

试验注册

当前对照试验ISRCTN25438351。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebdc/2131759/12685618d743/1472-6882-7-34-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验