Suppr超能文献

急性和慢性疾病患者的参与偏好。

Participation preferences of patients with acute and chronic conditions.

作者信息

Hamann Johannes, Neuner Bruno, Kasper Jürgen, Vodermaier Andrea, Loh Andreas, Deinzer Anja, Heesen Christoph, Kissling Werner, Busch Raymonde, Schmieder Roland, Spies Claudia, Caspari Cornelia, Härter Martin

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der TU München, München, Germany.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2007 Dec;10(4):358-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00458.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is little knowledge as to whether the chronicity of a disease affects patients' desire for participation.

AIM

To study whether participation preferences vary according to the type of disease. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Data of 1,393 patients from six trials with different medical conditions (hypertension, depression, breast cancer, schizophrenia, multiple sclerosis, minor traumas) were pooled and analysed, using multiple regression analysis controlling for socio-demographic variables.

RESULTS

Younger age, better education as well as female gender accounted for a small but statistically significantly greater desire to participate. Patients suffering from multiple sclerosis (MS) exhibited significantly higher participation preferences than the other diagnostic groups. There were no major differences between the other diagnostic groups. Age, gender, education and diagnosis explained only 14% of the variance.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no clear differences between chronic and acute conditions. However, patients suffering from MS, a chronic condition, were clearly different from all other diagnostic groups. The reasons for this difference remain unclear. The predictive value of socio-demography and type of illness is low.

摘要

背景

关于疾病的慢性程度是否会影响患者的参与意愿,目前所知甚少。

目的

研究参与偏好是否因疾病类型而异。

设计、参与者与方法:汇总并分析了来自六项针对不同医疗状况(高血压、抑郁症、乳腺癌、精神分裂症、多发性硬化症、轻度创伤)的试验中的1393名患者的数据,采用多元回归分析,并对社会人口统计学变量进行了控制。

结果

年龄较小、教育程度较高以及女性性别导致参与意愿虽小但在统计学上显著更高。患有多发性硬化症(MS)的患者表现出比其他诊断组明显更高的参与偏好。其他诊断组之间没有重大差异。年龄、性别、教育程度和诊断仅解释了14%的方差。

结论

我们发现慢性病和急性病之间没有明显差异。然而,患有慢性疾病MS的患者与所有其他诊断组明显不同。这种差异的原因尚不清楚。社会人口统计学和疾病类型的预测价值较低。

相似文献

1
Participation preferences of patients with acute and chronic conditions.
Health Expect. 2007 Dec;10(4):358-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00458.x.
2
Preferences of acutely ill patients for participation in medical decision-making.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Apr;17(2):97-100. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.021378.
3
Why do some patients with schizophrenia want to be engaged in medical decision making and others do not?
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;72(12):1636-43. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06119yel. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
4
Can patients' preferences for involvement in decision-making regarding the use of medicines be predicted?
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Jun;66(3):361-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.01.012. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
5
[The relevance of internal and external participation for patient satisfaction].
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2014 Aug;53(4):219-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1357116. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
6
7
How do patients from eastern and western Germany compare with regard to their preferences for shared decision making?
Eur J Public Health. 2012 Aug;22(4):469-73. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr112. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
8
Can psychiatrists and neurologists predict their patients' participation preferences?
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010 Apr;198(4):309-11. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181d6128c.
10
What do patients really want? Patients' preferences for treatment for angina.
Health Expect. 2008 Jun;11(2):137-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00482.x.

引用本文的文献

2
Power asymmetry and embarrassment in shared decision-making: predicting participation preference and decisional conflict.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 10;25(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02938-4.
6
When attitudes and beliefs get in the way of shared decision-making: A mediation analysis of participation preference.
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):740-751. doi: 10.1111/hex.13699. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
7
Patients Managing Their Medical Data in Personal Electronic Health Records: Scoping Review.
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 27;24(12):e37783. doi: 10.2196/37783.
8
Physicians' and Patients' Interruptions in Clinical Practice: A Quantitative Analysis.
Ann Fam Med. 2022 Sep-Oct;20(5):423-429. doi: 10.1370/afm.2846.
9
Facilitators of and Barriers to Adherence to Dietary Interventions Perceived by Women With Multiple Sclerosis and Their Support Persons.
Int J MS Care. 2022 Sep-Oct;24(5):235-241. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2021-051. Epub 2022 May 26.
10
Patients' Preference for Participation in Medical Decision-Making: Secondary Analysis of the BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE Trial.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Apr;38(5):1180-1189. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07775-z. Epub 2022 Sep 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions.
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jun;61(3):319-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.08.002. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
3
[Measuring shared decision making].
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2004 Mar;98(2):135-41.
4
A new model of medical decisions: exploring the limits of shared decision making.
Med Decis Making. 2003 Jul-Aug;23(4):275-80. doi: 10.1177/0272989X03256006.
5
Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997 Apr;2(2):112-21. doi: 10.1177/135581969700200209.
6
Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys.
Behav Med. 1998 Summer;24(2):81-8. doi: 10.1080/08964289809596384.
7
The Control Preferences Scale.
Can J Nurs Res. 1997 Fall;29(3):21-43.
9
Assessment of Preferences for self-treatment and information in health care.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980 Nov;39(5):977-90. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.977.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验